-
https://clinton.presidentiallibraries.us/files/original/b3f8b00791d947295f422e408536ca58.pdf
d87124a6b9d437261eac3171e9c4e03a
PDF Text
Text
FOIA Number:
2006-0469-F
FOIA
MARKER
This is not a textual record. This is used as an
administrative marker by the William J. Clinton
Presidential Library Staff.
Collection/Record Group:
Clinton Presidential Records
Subgroup/Office of Origin:
Speechwriting
Series/Staff Member:
Michael Waldman
Subseries:
OA/ID Number:
13658
FolderlD:
Folder Title:
[Reemployment Act] Budget Related
Stack:
Row:
Section:
Shelf:
Position:
S
92
2
11
1
�Withdrawal/Redaction Sheet
Clinton Library
DOCUMENT NO.
AND TYPE
001. paper
SUBJECT/TITLE
DATE
RE: Possible Changes in Negotiating Positions Due to Budget (1
page)
05/26/1994
RESTRICTION
P5
COLLECTION:
Clinton Presidential Records
Speechwriting
Michael Waldman
OA/Box Number:
13658
FOLDER TITLE:
[Reemployment Act] Budget Related
2006-0469-F
db2226
RESTRICTION CODES
Presidential Records Act - [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)|
Freedom of Information Act - |5 U.S.C. 552(b)|
PI Nation al Security Classified Information 1(a)(1) of the PRA|
P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(aX2) ofthe PRA|
P3 Releasi: would violate a Federal statute 1(a)(3) of the PRA|
P4 Releasi: would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or
financial information 1(a)(4) ofthe PRA|
PS Releasi; would disclose confidential advice between the President
and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(S) of the PRA]
P6 Releasi: would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
personal privacy 1(a)(6) of the PRA]
b(l) National security classified information |(b)(l) ofthe FOIA]
b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of
an agency 1(b)(2) ofthe FOIA]
b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute 1(b)(3) ofthe FOIA]
b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial
information 1(b)(4) ofthe FOIA]
b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIAJ
b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement
purposes 1(b)(7) ofthe FOIA]
b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of
financial institutions 1(b)(8) of the FOIA]
b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information
concerning wells |(bX9) of the FOIA]
C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed
of gift.
PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C.
2201(3).
RR. Document will be reviewed upon request.
�Withdrawal/Redaction Marker
Clinton Library
DOCUMENT NO.
AND TYPE
001. paper
SUBJECT/TITLE
DATE
RE: Possible Changes in Negotiating Positions Due to Budget (1
page)
05/26/1994
RESTRICTION
P5
COLLECTION:
Clinton Presidential Records
Speechwriting
Michael Waldman
OA/Box Number:
13658
FOLDER TITLE:
[Reemployment Act] Budget Related
2006-0469-F
db2226
RESTRICTION CODES
Presidential Records Act - |44 U.S.C. 2204(a)|
Freedom of Information Act - |5 U.S.C. 552(b)|
PI National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) ofthe PRA]
P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office 1(a)(2) of the PRA]
P3 Release would violate a Federal statute |(aX3) of the PRA]
P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or
financial information ((a)(4) of the PRA|
P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President
and his advisors, or between such advisors |a)(5) of the PRA]
P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
personal privacy 1(a)(6) of the PRA]
b(l) National security classified information 1(b)(1) of the FOIA]
b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of
an agency [(b)(2) ofthe FOIA]
b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute |(bX3) ofthe FOIA]
b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial
information [(b)(4) of the FOIA]
b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
personal privacy 1(b)(6) ofthe FOIA]
b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement
purposes 1(b)(7) ofthe FOIA]
b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of
financial institutions 1(b)(8) ofthe FOIA]
b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information
concerning wells |(bX9) of the FOIA]
C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed
of gift.
PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C.
2201(3).
RR. Doc ument will be reviewed upon request.
�MAY 4, 1994 DRAFT
ALLOCATION OF DISLOCATED WORKER FUNDING UNDER THE REA IN PY 1995:
IMPACT OF PROPOSED FORMULA CHANGES
o
The Reemployment Act of 1994 (REA) proposes changes in the formula used to allocate
dislocated worker funding among the States in order to more effectively target program
funds to those States with relatively greater numbers of dislocated workers who are in
need of readjustment services.
o
The current EDWAA formula allocates funds to the States on the basis of three factors
that are given equal weight - the relative shares of the different States of total
unemployed persons, total excess unemployed persons (above 4.5%), and total longterm unemployed persons (unemployed 15 weeks or longer).
o
The REA proposes to revise this formula by changing the definition of long-term
unemployed from 15 weeks or more of unemployment to 27 weeks or more, based on
research showing that unemployment of 27 weeks or longer is a more effective indicator
that a person has suffered a permanent job loss and is need of readjustment services to
obtain reemployment.
o
The REA also proposes to include a stop gain/stop loss provision that would prevent yearto-year changes in a State's allocation from falling more than 10% or increasing more than
30%, in order to prevent year-to-year changes in fundingfromdisrupting on-going
program operations.
o
The attached tables hold the funding constant for the purpose of simply measuring the
relative impact of the formula changes. In reality, all States would experience an increase
due to the requested increased funding levef The inpact of these formula changes, in
terms of PY 1995 funding under the REA, would result in:
some States receiving significant increases in funding, including Delaware (11%),
Rhode Island (9%), Connecticut and Massachusetts (7% each), West Virginia
%); and Kentucky and Maryland (4% each).
;
other States receiving significant reductions in funding,, including Wyoming and
Hawaii (10% each), Wisconsin (8%), Iowa and Alaska (7% each), Idaho,
Minnesota and Utah (6% each), and North Dakota and Tennessee (5% each).
o
Only two States would be affected by the stop-gain/stop-loss provision - the reduction in
funding for Hawaii and Wyoming would be limited to 10% each as opposed to 14.5% and
12.7%, respectively.
(NOTE: These changes in State allocations assume no relative changes in economic conditions
among the States between 1994 and 1995. Moreover, actual allocations will use the new BLS
TUR methodology and new CPS data on unemployment.)
�WINNNERS AND LOSERS AMONG KEY CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES
AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED FORMULA CHANGES
BUDGET/
APPROPRIATIONS
%
COMMITTEES
CHANGE
Delauro
Byrd
Hoyer
Lowey,
Serrano
Stokes
+6.9%
+5.2%
+4.1%
AUTHORIZING
%
COMMITTEES CHANGE
WINNERS
+1.5%
+1.1%
Roth
+11.4%
+8.8%
Chafee
+6.9%
Dodd
+6.8%
Kennedy
+5.2%
Byrd
+4.1%
Mikulski
+2.4%
Bradley
+1.5%
Moynihan
+1.3%
Ford
+1.1%
Metzenbaum
NEUTRAL
Cochran
Reid
Pelosi
Spector
+0.2%
-0.1%
-0.1%
-0.4%
Simon, etc
Woolsey,etc
Inouye
Kohl,
Obey
Harkin,
Smith
Stevens
Sabo
Bumpers
Sasser
Gephardt
Murray,
Gorton
Hollings
Hatfield
Mack
-10.0%
Harkin
Williams
+0.6%
-0.1%
L SR
OE S
-8.1%
-7.4%
-7.2%
-5.6%
-5.2%
-5.2%
-2.8%
-2.6%
-2.5%
-2.0%
-1.1%
-7.4%
-4.1%
�02/18/34
11:20 AM
Dislocated Worker Funding
Comparison of PY 1995 State Allotments
(75% State Allotments; 90/130 SGSL)
15-1- Weeks vs 27+ Wks for Long-term Unemp
w / 1 5 + Wks
State Total
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
1,098,750,000
w/ 27+ Wks
Difference
% Differenca
1.098.750,000
0
0.0%
15,410,567
2,488,275
12,808,491
7,538,222
193,506,518
8,738,437
19,095,130
1,819,536
3,053,296
58,039,281
22,514,060
1,694,038
3,007,049
57,183,121
14,648,615
4,118,678
4,145.846
14,234,606
16,781,939
6,401,707
20,492,319
36,280,649
41,912,302
10,692,633
8,598,430
16,060.358
2,618,117
1,531,791
5,150,233
5,781,230
45,236,091
5,282,593
97,092,071
16.458,113
986£85
43.799,682
8,545,335
12.685,809
53,545,731
25,715.857
6,539,177
12.268.094
658.412
13,548.832
69.957.328
2.365.447
2.287.292
18,205,349
23,942,498
13,583,929
8,733.722
966.870
-421,985
-192,239
-152,728
-414,560
-120,922
-63,014
1,227,102
185,830
-140,147
-661,438
554,390
-188,227
-191,355
314,739
-773,864
-327.628
-83,558
569,626
191,628
16,993
800,503
2,296,207
525,817
-633,891
14.712
-454,277
-111.335
26,018
-6,609
-91,055
1,044,673
-86,824
1,456,303
-510,234
-55,017
469,069
-308,634
-258,189
-197,370
-1,020,985
526,252
-312,894
-27.132
-743.671
103,812
-137,497
77,075
-868,190
-650.574
677,353
-764,630
-107,429
-2.7%
-7.2%
-1.2%
-5.2%
-0.1%
-0.7%
6.9%
11.4%
-4.4%
-1.1%
2.5%
-10.0%
-6.0%
0.6%
-5.0%
-7.4%
-2.0%
4.2%
1.2%
0.3%
4.1%
6.8%
1.3%
-5.6%
0.2%
-2.8%
-4.1%
1.7%
-0.1%
-1.6%
2.4%
-1.6%
1.5%
-3.0%
-5.3%
1.1%
-3.5%
-2.0%
-0.4%
-3.8%
8.8%
-2.5%
-4.0%
-5.2%
0.1%
-5.5%
3.5%
-4.6%
-2.6%
5.2%
-8.1%
-10.0%
15,832,552
2,680,514
12,961,219
7,952,782
193,627,440
8,801,451
17,868,028
1,633,706
3,193,443
58,700,719
21,959.670
1,882.265
3,198,404
56,868,382
15,422,479
4,446,306
4,229,404
13,664,980
16,590,311
6.384,714
19,691,816
33,984,442
41386,485
11,326,524
8,583,727
16^14,635"
2,729,452
1.505,773 *
5,156,842
5,872,285
44,191,418
5,369,417
95,635,768
16,968,347
1,041,302
43330,613
8,853,969
12,943,998
53.743.101
26,736,842
6,012,925
12,580,988
685.544
14,292,503
69,853,516
2,502.944
2,210,217
19,073.539
24,593.072
12.906,576
9.498.352
1,074,299
�DRAFT May 31, 1994
Responses to REA Issues Discussion with
Selected Intergovernmental Stakeholders
-- An Overview --
Selected Intergovernmental stakeholders and Department of Labor staff discussed selected
State and local concerns during a May 20 meeting.
By consensus, we agreed to redesign the Title III One-Stop Career Center System legislation.
We revamped the One-Stop approach to resemble school-to-work legislative structure, that
is:
o
Clear on expectations and outcomes, and
o
More flexible, prescribing less process and detail.
Under this approach:
•
States and localities will work out the specifics regarding the interrelated issues of
administration, accountability, and fiscal authority and describe their agreements in
the One-Stop implementation proposal.
•
States and localities would adhere to four basic criteria in structuring One-Stop
system implementation proposals: (1) universality; (2) accountability; (3) customer
choice; and (4) integration. The Department will measure State proposals by the
extent to which they meet these criteria.
Under this more flexible approach, the Department will retain some specific provisions:
•
The legislation will specify the composition of the local workforce investment entity.
Localities will have the flexibility to define the local governance entity's
responsibilities or functions.
•
The ES -- regardless of the One-Stop mechanism selected (consortium, multioperator, or other — must be a participant in the administration and operation of
One-Stop for at least for an initial period.
•
The JTPA Title VII Human Resource Investment Council language will serve as the
exemplary standard for State-level governance. However, States may propose
alternative structures, while maintaining business, labor, and other organization
balanced representation. The Department will assess these alternatives based on the
degree of program integration to be achieved.
•
Other appropriate provisions to be determined.
�Draft -- Drafr-- Draft -- Draft
Staff Draft of Suggested Next Steps from Issues Conference
(5/31/94)
1) Meeting Summary
DOL will provide participating intergovernmental associations with a written summation of the
May 20th meeting on Tuesday, May 31. At the Issues Conference the groups agreed to
review the meeting summary and comment to DOL if there are differences of opinion on the
account of the meeting. DOL would like to receive comments on or before Wednesday, June
8 The associations should coordinate their own delegates' comments
2) Small Working Groups
At the Issues Conference, the associations agreed to convene small working groups around
three of the identified open issues listed below. Each small group will work with DOL to
produce recommendations related to resolving concerns around the pertinent issues
In an effort to make this manageable, each small working group should have no more than 2
representatives from an association. DOL will facilitate the exchange of information about (a)
which small groups each association wishes to be involved in (some associations may not be
interested in certain issues) and (b) who will be the association delegates for each working
group. To facilitate the distribution of this information, each association can provide their
plans with regards to (a) and (b) above when they return comments on the meeting summary
on Wednesday, June 8.
On Friday, June 10, DOL will circulate back to the associations each small group's plans for
proceeding. The process may vary by small group; for example, the associations may want to
meet without DOL on the federal barriers issue, whereas they may want to talk immediately
with DOL on one of the other issues. (Additionally, the small groups will need to take into
account the ICESA and USCM conferences in mid-June.) If associations have suggestions on
how a specific working group should proceed (for example, paper exchange, conference call,
etc.), they can provide comments to DOL when sending the group's feedback on the meeting
summary on Wednesday, June 8. DOL will circulate these suggestions back to the
associations prior to June 10 so the small groups can use this information as they establish
plans for proceeding.
The small group issues include:
a) federal barriers/standardization of federal program requirements
b) UI administration
c) income support eligibility clarification/sufficiency of funds
3) Draft Report to Congress on common terms and definitions
DOL agreed to circulate to the associations its draft report to Congress on common terms and
definitions. The draft report will be sent to association staff no later than Friday, June 3.
�4) One Stop Grant Announcement
The associations have reviewed the proposed approach to the One Stop Grant Announcement
and have until Friday, May 27, to provide comments. We will address comments received in
the announcement which will be issued on June 15. We will continue to work with the
associations on the One Stop approach in the REA.
5) DOL/ETA will clarify and circulate LMI language in Sec. 113 and Title IV.
6) Large Group Meeting
Depending on the reaction to the meeting summary, proposed language changes and other small
working group products, the One Stop Grant Announcement, views of the associations and their
delegates, and other factors, we may need to arrange another conference with the
intergovernmental associations. This possibility will be reviewed as we proceed.
7) Comments on Next Steps
If there are any comments or concerns regarding these next steps please do not hesitate to call
Liz Gonchar at 219-6075, ext. 181.
�Suggested Timeline
Friday. May 27
- Comments on One Stop Grant Announcement due to Grace Kilbane
- Draft Next Steps sent to Association Staff
Wednesday. June 1
- Summary of Issues Conference Sent to Groups
Friday. June 3
- DOL deadline for sending Draft Report to Congress on common terms and definitions to association
staff
Wednesday. June 8
- Suggested last day for sending the following to DOL:
- comments on meeting summary
- names/addresses/phone and fax numbers of delegates for each small working group
- suggestions if there are any on how specific small working groups should proceed (DOL can
then circulate these back to participating delegates)
Friday. June 10
- Small working groups should have plan for proceeding by this date
�
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Michael Waldman
Description
An account of the resource
<p>Michael Waldman was Assistant to the President and Director of Speechwriting from 1995-1999. His responsibilities were writing and editing nearly 2,000 speeches, which included four State of the Union speeches and two Inaugural Addresses. From 1993 -1995 he served as Special Assistant to the President for Policy Coordination.</p>
<p>The collection generally consists of copies of speeches and speech drafts, talking points, memoranda, background material, correspondence, reports, handwritten notes, articles, clippings, and presidential schedules. A large volume of this collection was for the State of the Union speeches. Many of the speech drafts are heavily annotated with additions or deletions. There are a lot of articles and clippings in this collection.</p>
<p>Due to the size of this collection it has been divided into two segments. Use links below for access to the individual segments:<br /><a href="http://clinton.presidentiallibraries.us/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=43&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=2006-0469-F+Segment+1">Segment One</a><br /><a href="http://clinton.presidentiallibraries.us/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=43&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=2006-0469-F+Segment+2">Segment Two</a></p>
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Michael Waldman
Office of Speechwriting
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
1993-1999
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
2006-0469-F
Extent
The size or duration of the resource.
Segment One contains 1071 folders in 72 boxes.
Segment Two contains 868 folders in 66 boxes.
Provenance
A statement of any changes in ownership and custody of the resource since its creation that are significant for its authenticity, integrity, and interpretation. The statement may include a description of any changes successive custodians made to the resource.
Clinton Presidential Records: White House Staff and Office Files
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
William J. Clinton Presidential Library & Museum
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
Adobe Acrobat Document
Still Image
A static visual representation. Examples include paintings, drawings, graphic designs, plans and maps. Recommended best practice is to assign the type Text to images of textual materials.
Original Format
The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data
paper
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
[Reemployment Act] Budget Related
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Office of Speechwriting
Michael Waldman
Is Part Of
A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included.
Box 29
<a href="http://clinton.presidentiallibraries.us/items/show/36403"> Collection Finding Aid</a>
<a href="https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7763296">National Archives Catalog Description</a>
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
2006-0469-F Segment 1
Provenance
A statement of any changes in ownership and custody of the resource since its creation that are significant for its authenticity, integrity, and interpretation. The statement may include a description of any changes successive custodians made to the resource.
White House Staff and Office Files
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
William J. Clinton Presidential Library & Museum
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
Adobe Acrobat Document
Medium
The material or physical carrier of the resource.
Preservation-Reproduction-Reference
Date Created
Date of creation of the resource.
6/3/2015
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
7763296
42-t-7763296-20060469F-Seg1-029-006-2015