-
https://clinton.presidentiallibraries.us/files/original/9001bc8ad4478b46c1ffa5c148c7b965.pdf
4dea56d86f4eb2132941e0e84326358f
PDF Text
Text
NLWJC - KAGAN
EMAILS RECEIVED
ARMS - BOX 100 - FOLDER -001
[03/19/1999-04/06/1999 ]
�ARMS Email System
RECORD TYPE: PRESIDENTIAL
Page 1 of 22
(NOTES MAIL)
CREATOR: Melissa G. Green ( CN=Melissa G. Green/OU=OPD/O=EOP [ OPD 1 )
CREATION DATE/TIME:19-MAR-1999 18:44:46.00
SUBJECT:
Additional budget paper
TO: Barry J. Toiv ( CN=Barry J. Toiv/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Barbara Chow ( CN=Barbara Chow/OU=OMB/O=EOP @ EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Joshua Gotbaum ( CN=Joshua Gotbaum/OU=OMB/O=EOP @ EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: William A. Halter ( cN=william A. Halter/OU=OMB/O=EOP @ EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Laura Emmett ( CN=Laura Emmett/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: jgreen ( jgreen @ pfaw [ UNKNOWN 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Andrei H. Cherny ( CN=Andrei H. Cherny/O=OVP @ OVP [ UNKNOWN 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Ruby Shamir ( CN=Ruby Shamir/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Robin J. Bachman ( CN=Robin J. Bachman/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Elizabeth R. Newman ( CN=Elizabeth·R. Newman/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Mickey Ibarra ( CN=Mickey Ibarra/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Jeffrey A. Forbes ( CN=Jeffrey A. Forbes/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Lynn G. Cutler ( CN=Lynn G. Cutler/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: William H. White Jr.
READ: UNKNOWN
( CN=william H.
Wh~te
Jr./OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
TO: Cynthia A. Rice ( CN=Cynthia A. Rice/OU=OPD/O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Barbara D. Woolley ( CN=Barbara D. Woolley/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Charles R. Marr ( CN=Charles R. Marr/OU=OPD/O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Sara M. Latham ( CN=Sara M. Latham/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
�Page 2 of22
ARMS Email System
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Lisa M. Kountoupes ( CN=Lisa M. Kountoupes/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Michael Waldman ( CN=Michael Waldman/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Jordan Tamagni ( CN=Jordan Tamagni/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Ronald L. Silberman ( CN=Ronald L. Silberman/OU=OMB/O=EOP @ EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Laura D. Schwartz ( CN=Laura D. Schwartz/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ:UNKNOWN
TO: Bruce N .. Reed ( CN=Bruce N. Reed/OU=OPD/O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: John Podesta ( CN=John Podesta/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP
READ: UNKNOWN
[ WHO 1 )
TO: Bob J. Nash ( CN=Bob J. Nash/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Janet Murguia ( CN=Janet Murguia/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Linda L. Moore ( CN=Linda L. Moore/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Anne E. McGuire ( CN=Anne E. McGuire/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Cathy R. Mays ( CN=Cathy R. Mays/OU=OPD/O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Sylvia M. Mathews ( CN=Sylvia M. Mathews/OU=OMB/O=EOP @ EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Bruce R. Lindsey ( CN=Bruce R. Lindsey/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOym
TO: Ann F. Lewis ( CN=Ann F. Lewis/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP
READ: UNKNOWN
[ WHO 1 )
TO: Robert D. Kyle ( CN=Robert D. Kyle/OU=OMB/O=EOP @ EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Charles Konigsberg ( CN=Charles Konigsberg/OU=OMB/O=EOP @ EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Thomas A. Kalil ( CN=Thomas A. Kalil/OU=OPD/O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Christopher C. Jennings ( CN=Christopher C. Jennings/OU=OPD/O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD 1
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Nancy V. Hernreich ( CN=Nancy V. Hernreich/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
�ARMS Email System
Page 3 of22
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Diane M. Goldberg ( CN=Diane M. Goldberg/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Michael Deich ( CN=Michael Deich/OU=OMB/O=EOP @ EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: MCrisci ( MCrisci @ arnellgroup.com @ inet
READ: UNKNOWN
[ UNKNOWN 1 )
TO: Cheryl M. Carter ( CN=Cheryl M. Carter/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: David Belsky ( CN=David Belsky/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP
READ: UNKNOWN
[ WHO 1 )
TO: Marsha E. Berry ( CN=Marsha E. Berry/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Kris M Balderston ( CN=Kris M Balderston/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Brenda M. Anders ( CN=Brenda M. Anders/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Eli G. Attie ( CN=Eli G. Attie/O=OVP @ OVP
READ: UNKNOWN
[ oVP 1 )
TO: Jennifer M. Palmieri ( CN=Jennifer M. Palmieri/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Jonathan A. Kaplan ( CN=Jonathan A. Kaplan/OU=OPD/O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Mona G. Mohib ( CN=Mona G. Mohib/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Jackson T. Dunn ( CN=Jackson T. Dunn/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Mona K. Sutphen ( CN=Mona K. Sutphen/OU=NSC/O=EOP @ EOP [ NSC 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Michele Jolin ( CN=Michele Jolin/OU=CEA/O=EOP @ EOP [ CEA 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Sandra L. Via ( CN=Sandra L. Via/OU=OMB/O=EOP @ EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Victoria A. Wachino ( CN=Victoria A. Wachino/OU=OMB/O=EOP @ EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Robert L. Nabors ( CN=Robert L. Nabors/OU=OMB/O=EOP @ EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Jonathan E. Smith ( CN=Jonathan E. Smith/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Karen Tramontano ( CN=Karen Tramontano/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
�ARMS Email System
Page 4 of22
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Dawn L. Smalls
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Maria E. S,oto
READ: UNKNOWN
CN=Dawn L. Smalls/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO
CN=Maria E. Soto/OU=WHO/O=EOP
@
i )
EOP [ WHO 1 )
TO: Dario J. Gomez ( CN=Dario J. Gomez/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Mindy E. Myers ( CN=Mindy E. Myers/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Richard M. Samans ( CN=Richard M. Samans/OU=OPD/O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Peter A. Weissman ( CN=Peter A. Weissman/OU=OPD/O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Sally Katzen ( CN=Sally Katzen/OU=OPD/O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Daniel D. Heath ( CN=Daniel D. Heath/OU=OMB/O=EOP @ EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Doris Parker ( CN=Doris Parker/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Richard L. Siewert ( CN=Richard L. Siewert/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Sonyia Matthews ( CN=Sonyia Matthews/OU=OPD/O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Sarah Rosen ( CN=Sarah Rosen/OU=OPD/O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ:UNKNOWN
TO: HorwitzR ( HorwitzR @ sec.gov @ INET @ LNGTWY [ UNKNOWN 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Dominique L. Cano ( CN=Dominique L. Cano/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Sidney Blumenthal ( CN=Sidney Blumenthal/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Brian A. Barreto ( CN=Brian A. Barreto/OU=OPD/O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Stacie Spector ( CN=Stacie Spector/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Mark D. Neschis ( CN=Mark D. Neschis/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ:UNKNOWN
TO: Noa A. Meyer ( CN=Noa A. Meyer/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Neera Tanden ( CN=Neera Tanden/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
�ARMS Email System
Page 5 of22
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Michael V. Terrell ( CN=Michael V. Terrell/OU=CEQ/O=EOP @ EOP [ CEQ 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Leanne A. Shimabukuro ( CN=Leanne A. Shimabukuro/OU=OPD/O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Virginia N. Rustique ( CN=Virginia N. Rustique/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Virginia M. Terzano ( CN=Virginia M. Terzano/O=OVP @ OVP [ UNKNOWN 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Minyon Moore ( CN=Minyon Moore/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP
READ: UNKNOWN
[ WHO 1 )
TO: Lisa J. Levin ( CN=Lisa J. Levin/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Aviva Steinberg ( CN=Aviva Steinberg/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Robert B. Johnson ( CN=Robert B. Johnson/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Beverly J. Barnes (CN=Beverly J. Barnes/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Thomas D. Janenda ( CN=Thomas D. Janenda/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Brian D. Smith ( CN=Brian D. Smith/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Paul J. Weinstein
READ: UNKNOWN
J~.
( CN=Paul J. Weinstein Jr./OU=OPD/O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD 1 )
TO: Douglas B. Sosnik ( CN=Douglas B. Sosnik/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Dorothy Robyn ( CN=Dorothy Robyn/OU=OPD/O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Ashley L. Raines ( CN=Ashley L. Raines/OU=OA/O=EOP @ EOP [ OA 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Kelley L. O'Dell ( CN=Kelley L. O'Dell/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Alison Muscatine ( CN=Alison Muscatine/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Kevin S. Moran ( CN=Kevin S. Moran/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Joseph J. Minarik ( CN=Joseph J. Minarik/OU=OMB/O=EOP @ EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Douglas R. Matties ( CN=Douglas R. Matties/OU=OA/O=EOP @ EOP [ OA 1 )
�ARMS Email System
Page 6 of22
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Julie E. Mason ( CN=Julie E. Mason!OU=WHO!O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Jacob J. Lew ( CN=Jacob J. Lew!OU=OMB!O=EOP @ EOP
READ: UNKNOWN
[ OMB 1 )
TO: Jeanne Lambrew ( CN=Jeanne Lambrew!OU=OPD!O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Karin Kullman ( CN=Karin Kullman!OU=OPD!O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Elena Kagan ( CN=Elena Kagan!OU=OPD!O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Eli P. Joseph ( CN=Eli P. Joseph!OU=WHO!O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Thomas L. Freedman ( CN=Thomas L. Freedman!OU=OPD!O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Betty W. Currie (' CN=Betty W. Currie!OU=WHO!O=EOP
READ: UNKNOWN
@
EOP [ WHO 1 )
TO: Brenda B. Costello ( CN=Brenda B. Costello!OU=WHO!O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Phillip Caplan ( CN=Phillip Caplan!OU=WHO!O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Jill M Blickstein
READ: UNKNOWN
Jill M Blickstein @ Ianmail.fanniemae.com @ inet [ UNKNOWN 1
TO: Richard B. Bavier ( CN=Richard B. Bavier!OU=OMB!O=EOP @ EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Jessica L. Gibson ( CN=Jessica L. Gibson!OU=WHO!O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Linda Ricci ( CN=Linda Ricci!OU=OMB!O=EOP @ EOP
READ: UNKNOWN
[ OMB 1 )
TO: Lowell A. Weiss ( CN=Lowell A. Weiss!OU=WHO!O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Rebecca L. Walldorff ( CN=Rebecca L. Walldorff!OU=WHO!O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Alice H. Williams ( CN=Alice H. Williams!OU=CEA!O=EOP @ EOP [ CEA 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Janet L. Graves ( CN=Janet L. Graves!OU=OMB!O=EOP @ EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Adrienne C. Erbach ( CN=Adrienne C. Erbach!OU=OMB!O=EOP @ EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Tracy
Pakuln~ewicz
( CN=Tracy Pakulniewicz!OU=WHO!O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
�ARMS Email System
Page 7 of22
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Carolyn T. Wu ( CN=Carolyn T. Wu/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Heather M. Riley ( CN=Heather M. Riley/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Jade L Riley ( CN=Jade L Riley/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Jason H. Schechter ( CN=Jason H. Schechter/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1. )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Sharon H. Yuan ( CN=Sharon H. Yuan/OU=OPD/O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Dora Kale ( CN=Dora Kale/OU=NSC/O=EOP @ EOP [ NSC 1 )
READ: UNKN:OWN
TO: Malcolm R. Lee ( CN=Malcolm R. Lee/OU=OPD/O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: David J. Sherman ( CN=David J. Sherman/OU=NSC/O=EOP @ EOP
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: MITSLER E
READ:UNKNOWN
MITSLER E @ Al @ CD @ LNGTWY [ EOP 1 )
NSC 1 )
(NSC)
TO: Gay L. Joshlyn ( CN=Gay L. Joshlyn/OU=OPD/O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Lael Brainard ( CN=Lael Brainard/OU=OPD/O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Chandler G. Spaulding ( CN=Chandler G. Spaulding/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Joshua S. Gottheimer ( CN=Joshua S. Gottheimer/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TEXT:
---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa G. Green/OPD/EOP on 03/19/99
06:44 PM ---------------------------
Charles R. Marr
03/19/99 06:32:52 PM
Record Type:
Record
To:
Melissa G. Green/OPD/EOP
cc:
Subject:
Additional budget paper
Melissa -- can you blast email.
These are additional one-pagers on Republican budget:
�ARMS Email System
Page 8 of22
Urban
Environment
Education and Training
==================== ATTACHMENT
1 ====================
ATT CREATION TIME/DATE:
0 00:00:00.00
TEXT:
Unable to convert ARMS_EXT: [ATTACH.D78)ARMS16175688P.036 to ASCII,
The following is a HEX DUMP:
FF5750439FOFOOOOOIOA020100000002050000008D2A000000020000514A90A8E365055FFCA328
EA8A021DB05FADE67D7FOFFF3E9ABCFIF1528D0675A7499388D585C37CA2D23BC3DIE654F04312
7D62332D4D41A9634C6624EDA45BA54262C4BB68751FCAC61F316ACIEB3CAC59EE8D19AOOB6365
FEF424AA1219276921CBD380F2A975915FAOD8FOCA600C8D47953554B57AF621AA198E08A5A55E
F075F1573E566F305E28EB7B6BF2296710405AAED673468549D897676FD982C8A072EB0674FA94
54F26E5FA9F04605DEB7F773362AB556A3F4883BF245A4FF6F9D5B8EDDIAF36654BOCBOF8AC7Fl
FID60398C308C832394C7CAF6053F910B3DE24FF20D9414A89CFEC3179ED241E4D08BA37A9664C
2CE195970B80DOD56F9C4911BEF6B93469E19182A0357378E36916CF28F60F93428B69836F70BO
A82CBOF2EC2A557496EIE589C26D46AC40El12B33DF4BOE4DA7887CE25DAI078326945729F575D
2FDA98EC12D52CDD59ACIA28E5D469BAC629DCD8C803BIC2C30442B121F03844C07C2B14D371A2
D35689DIII0083FDOBE7F07513F2105CD814D27B4D05F734919B176E78EID9EBED85028D3B531A
397FIB2A2ED4DDE711027A20229CF86C71B24DC4FE7CB47E51F906AEOBD8FIOB7CA02FF6C4553D
7669654E3AB5B3C7BFODED7E7C7CC7506972466A4571F43262ACD44B1893965EFAOF7A8F9A8F63
4A5E29DE5D0200A500000000000000000000000823010000000BOI0000060B0000005509000000
4EOOOOOOIIOC0000092501000000060000005FOCOOOOOB300200000028000000650C0000087701
000000400000008DOC000008340100000014000000CDOC00000802OlOOOOOOOFOOOOOOEIOCOOOO
08050100000008000000FOOC000000550100000048000000F80COO000045020000000200000040
OD000006080100000022000000420DOOOOOB300200000063000000640D00000055020000004EOO
0000C70DOOOOOB300C0000004C000000150E00000931010000006D000000610EOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
0000000000610E00000055030000003COOOOOOCEOEOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOCEOEOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOCEOEOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOCEOEOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOCEOEOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOCEOEOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOCEOE000000000000000000000000
CEOEOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOCEOEOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOCEOEOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOCEOEOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOQOCEOEOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOCEOEOOOOOOOOOOOO
000000000000CEOEOOOOOB30010000004EOOOOOOOAOFOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAOFOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAOFOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAOFOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAOF
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAOFOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAOFOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOAOFOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAOFOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAOFOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
000000000AOF00000942010000001D000000580FOOOOOOOOOOOOOO0000000000580FOOOOOOOOOO
00000000000000580F000000000000000000000000580FOOOOOOOO0000000000000000580FOOOO
00000000000000000000580F000000000000000000000000580FOO000000000000000000000058
OF000000000000000000000000580FOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO580FOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
0000580F000000000000000000000000580FOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO000000580FOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
0000000000580F000000000000000000000000580FOOOOOOOOOOOO000000000000580FOOOOOOOO
0000000000000000580F000000000000000000000000580FOOOOOO000000000000000000580FOO
0000000000000000000000580F000000000000000000000000580F000000000000000000000000
580F000000000000000000000000580FOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO00580FOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
000000580F000000000000000000000000580FOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO00000000580FOOOOOOOOOOOO
000000000000580F000000000000000000000000580FOOOOOOOOOO00000000000000580FOOOOOO
000000000000000000580F000000000000000000000000580FOOOO00000000000000000000580F
000000000000000000000000580F00000000000000000000000058OFOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
00580F000000000000000000000000580FOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO0000580FOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
00000000580F000000000000000000000000580FOOOOOOOOOOOOOO0000000000580FOOOOOOOOOO
00000000000000580F000000000000000000000000580FOOOOOOOO0000000000000000580FOOOO
00000000000000000000580F000000000000000000000000580FOO000000000000000000000058
�Automated Records Management System
Hex-Dump Conversign
Republican Budget Shortchanges Urban America
March 19, 1999
Building on the success of six years of fiscal discipline and the virtuous economic cycle it created, President
Clinton has proposed a budget that includes a more than $3.4 trillion debt reduction lock-box that extends the
solvency of Social Security until 2055 and extends Medicare's solvency for more than a decade. It invests in
e.ducation and a cleaner environment, and a stronger urban America.
To build on the President and Vice President's strong foundation of community empowerment initiatives -which includes programs to promote greater access to capital and credit, more affordable housing, and spur the
creation of private investment and job creation -- the FY2000 budget includes proposals to:
_
_
_
Expand the Low Income and Housing Tax Credit.
Make the brownfields tax expensing provision permanent.
Create Better America Bonds to allow communities to create parks and open spaces.
Spur private investment in distressed neighborhoods through a new markets initiative.
Expand the welfare-to-work housing voucher program.
The Republicans have responded with a proposal that puts top priority on a tax cut which explodes in cost and is
targeted away from the middle class. Because the tax cut is so large and consumes the entire on-budget
surplus, the funds available for critical investments in urban America are squeezed dramatically:
The Republican budget would require a more than 10 percent cut in 2000 and over 20 percent cut in 2004
unprotected discretionary programs. This would have a devastating impact on programs critical to our
urban areas:
•
The cut to HUD's HOME program would deny tenant-based rental assistance to 1,300 families.
Further, funds would be lost for new construction, rehabilitation, or acquisition of over 10,000
affordable housing units.
•
The Republicans' reductions would wipe out the Administration's proposal of adding 100,000 new
housing vouchers, including 25,000 to help move families from welfare to work, 18,000 for the
homeless, and 15,000 for extremely low-income elderly.
•
The Community Development Financial Institutions Fund (CDFI) would be reduced by over $11
million, with the result that 16 fewer community development institutions (CDFIs) would receive capital
funding and 12 fewer financial institutions would receive Bank Enterprise Act grants. By 2004, the
Republican budget would reduce CDFI's funding by $26 million, eliminating federal assistance to 37 CDFIs
and 28 commercial CDFI lenders.
Programs critical to urban America would be at risk because of
A low priority in the Republican budget:
the squeeze on the overall discretionary funds proposed. The assumptions made in the Republican budget
resolutions show that programs important to urban America would be a low priority in competition for those
funds:
•
The Senate Budget Resolution proposes $5.3 billion in 2000 for community and regional development,
$3.4 billion or 39.2 percent less than a freeze and $3.6 billion or 40.7 percent less than the President's
budget. This would mean a massive reduction to the Community Development Block Grant Program
(CDBG), one of the most popular and flexible sources of funds that mayors and governors use to
improve economic opportunity and housing in low-income communities. Thousands of local
neighborhood improvement efforts would be jeopardized. Cuts of 40 percent in this set of HUD
programs would translate into a loss of assistance to 82,000 homes and loss of support for 114,000
jobs in low-income areas.
�Automated Recorcls Management System
Hex·Dump Conversion
The Republican Budget:
Sacrificing Our Environment and Public Health
President Clinton is proposing a record $33.9 billion in FY 2000 to protect our environment and public
health, including major new initiatives to preserve America's lands legacy, combat air pollution and
global warming, and help build livable communities/or the 21st century~
The Republican budget not only fails to fund these environmental priorities. but imposes drastic cuts
that would stop toxic waste cleanups. shut down national parks. cripple water quality programs. and
heighten the risk of deadIv wildfires.
The Republican budget slashes funding for priority domestic programs 12 percent in FY 2000 and 28
percent in 2004. Across-the-board cuts would have these devastating impacts on public health and the
environment:
>
Stopping 135 Toxic Waste Cleanups - The Republican budget would cut Superfund by a total of
$1.5 billion over the next five years, needlessly jeopardizing public health by preventing as many
as 135 priority cleanups nationwide -- 92 percent of the federally led cleanups planned.
Shutting Down National Parks - Cuts to the National Park Service would reduce services and
hours of operation at 378 parks and other facilities serving almost 300 million visitors a year. In
FY 2004, $575 million in cuts would shut down many smaller parks and backcountry areas in
larger parks, and jeopardize visitor safety by blocking vital maintenance and repairs.
Squandering Our Lands Legacy - By failing to fund the President's Lands Legacy initiative, the
Republican budget would block federal efforts to preserve natural treasures, and deny states and
communities $588 million to protect farmland, coastland, urban parks and other green spaces.
Slashing Water and Public Health Protections - By FY 2004, cuts to the Environmental
Protection Agency would eliminate funding for the Clean Water Action Plan, which helps
communities clean up the 40 percent of surveyed waters still too polluted for fishing or swimming;
and let polluters off the hook by crippling EPA's ability to enforce public health protections.
Gambling with Global Warming - Cuts to the Department of Energy and EPA would gut efforts
toward cleaner, more efficient energy for homes, transportation, and industry; and keep the
Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles from meeting its goal of new cars three times more
fuel-efficient than today's models by 2004.
Crippling Wildlife Protections - Cuts to the Fish and Wildlife Service, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, and Army Corps of Engineers would hamper salmon restoration in
the Pacific Northwest, shut down wildlife refuges, and halt efforts to restore endangered species.
Raising the Risk 0/ Deadly Wildfires - FY 2000 cuts to the Forest Service and Bureau of Land
Management would close some lands to the public and reduce firefighting capabilities. A total of
$700 million in FY 2004 cuts for these two agencies would cripple firefighting capabilities,
jeopardizing lives and property throughout the West.
�Automated Records Management System
Hex-Dump Conversion
Republican Budget
Shortchanges Education and Training
March 19, 1999
Building on the success of six years of fiscal discipline and the virtuous economic cycle it created,
President Clinton has proposed a budget that includes a more than $3.4 trillion debt reduction lock-box
that extends the solvency of Social Security until 2055 and extends Medicare's solvency for more than a
decade. The President's budget continues to place top priority on investments in education, including:
Performance Accountability: $200 million in Title I to hold States and school districts more
accountable for raising student achievement.
21st Century Community Learning Centers/After-School and Summer School Programs:
$600 million for the 21 st Century/After-School program, an increase of $400 million over the FY
1999 level to help schools end social promotion through extended learning time.
New Qualified Teachers and Smaller Class Sizes: $1.4 billion as the second installment of the
President's plan to help schools recruit, hire, and train 100,000 new teachers by 2005 and reduce
class size in the early grades.
Tax Credits to Build Modern Schools for Our Children. A centerpiece of the President's tax
cut agenda is to provide Federal tax credits to support nearly $25 billion in bonds to build and
renovate public schools at a cost of $3.7 billion over 5 years.
_ A $963 Million Three-Part Initiative To Close America's Skills Gap: 1) $190 million
increase for adult education and family literacy initiative. 2) $368 Million increase for a
universal re-employment initiative. 3) $405 million increase for a youth employment initiative.
Expanding Head Start: A $607 million increase that will add 42,000 new slots for young
children, including 7,000 Early Head Start slots, for total emollment of 877,000 and on track to
meet the one million participation goal by 2002.
The Republicans have responded with a proposal that puts top priority on a tax cut which explodes in cost
and is targeted away from the middle class. Republicans have talked about making education a higher
priority, but the actions in this budget are in the other direction. Because the tax cut is so large and
consumes the entire on-budget surplus, the funds available for critical investments in education would be
squeeze dramatically.
The Republican budget would require a more than 10 percent cut in 2000 and over 20 percent cut
in 2004 unprotected discretionary programs. This would have a devastating impact on critical
education, training, and other programs for children:
Head Start funding would be less than FY 1998 levels, a reduction of $1.1 billion from the FY 2000
Budget. . A reduction of this magnitude would roll back all expansion progress made under the
Clinton Administration, cutting services to up to 100,000 children, and making it practically
impossible to reach the goal of serving one million children in Head Start by 2002. By 2004, Head
Start emollment would drop below FY 1999 levels by over 230,000 children.
Work Study would be cut by $106 million from the FY 1999 level of$870 million, to the lowest
level since FY 1996. The number of students served would decrease by 112,000, from 930,000 in FY
1999. If the Republican plan were assumed to continue through FY 2004, over a quarter of a million
fewer students (257,000) would have the chance to work their way through college than in FY 1999.
�Automated Records Management System
Hex-Dump Conversion
•
•
TRIO funding would decrease by $73 million, from $600 million in FY 1999. As a result,
approximately 117,000 fewer students would receive college preparation and support services in FY
2000 than in FY 1999. By FY 2004, the Republican plan would cut 224,000 disadvantaged students
from TRIO programs.
GEAR-UP would be reduced $15 million, from $120 million in FY 1999. This funding level would
not be sufficient to fund non-competing continuation awards from FY 1999. Approximately 5,900
fewer low-income students would receive early intervention services in FY 2000 than in FY 1999.
The Republican plan would further cut GEAR-UP so that more than 36,000 fewer students would
receive services in FY 2004 than in FY 1999.
.•
Dislocated Worker Assistance would be cut by $171 million below FY 1999, denying training, job
search assistance, and support services to about 90,200 dislocated workers. In FY 2004, the
Republican plan would deny services to over 205,600 dislocated workers.
About 73,100 training and summer job opportunities for low-income youth would be eliminated.
In FY 2004, about 166,000 low-income youth would be denied training and summer job
opportunities.
•
This reduction could terminate Jobs Corps' planned 4-center expansion and/or force Job Corps to
close 5-6 other centers in 2000. This could eliminate about 5,000 residential training slots for
extremely disadvantaged youth in 2000. In 2004, this could result in over 11,000 students being
denied the opportunity to participate in Job Corps.
The Child Care and Development Block Grant (CCDBG) would be reduced by $122 million,
eliminating child care assistance for up to 34,000 low-income children. By 2004, the number of
children receiving assistance would drop below FY 1999 levels by up to 79,000 children.
WIC funding would be cut to below FY 1995 levels, a reduction of over $480 million from the FY
1999 level of$3.9 billion, eliminating nutrition assistance for over 875,000 low income women,
infants, and children each month. Furthermore, if the Republican plan were assumed to continue
through FY 2004, funding for the program would be reduced by $1.1 billion below the FY 1999
funding level, cutting approximately 1.9 million participants from the program.
�ARMS Email System
RECORD TYPE: PRESIDENTIAL
Page 1 of 1
(NOTES MAIL)
CREATOR: Thomas L. Freedman ( CN=Thomas L. Freedman/OU=OPD/O=EOP [ OPD 1 )
CREATION DATE/TIME: 22-MAR-1999 15:10:21.00
SUBJECT:
George will and equal pay
TO: Cordelia W. Reimers ( CN=Cordelia W. Reimers/OU=CEA/O=EOP @ EOP [ CEA 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Elena. Kagan ( CN=Elena Kagan/OU=OPD/O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Rebecca M. Blank ( CN=Rebecca M. Blank/OU=CEA/O=EOP @ EOP [ CEA 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
CC: Mary L. Smith ( CN=Mary L. Smith/OU=OPD/O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD 1
READ: UNKNOWN
TEXT:
George will has a column in today's Newsweek saying the equal pay figures
are "lies" and quoting Furchtgott-Roth and Stolba.
It is an argument we
have had in the past, but will now be raised more prominently and with
academic support.
Could you at CEA take a look at the column and propose
a fact-based rebuttal to Will's assertion: the wage gap is small,
voluntary and doesn't require government involvement.
Thanks.
�Page 1 of 1
ARMS Email System
RECORD TYPE: PRESIDENTIAL
(NOTES MAIL)
CREATOR: Rebecca M. Blank ( CN=Rebecca M. Blank/OU=CEA/O=EOP [ CEA 1
CREATION DATE/TIME:29-MAR-1999 11:06:34.00
SUBJECT:
Furchtgott-Roth & Stolba book
TO: Elena Kagan ( CN=Elena Kagan/OU=OPD/O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD 1
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Thomas L. Freedman ( CN=Thomas L. Freedman/OU=OPD/O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD 1
READ: UNKNOWN
CC: Cordelia W. Reimers ( CN=Cordelia W. Reimers/OU=CEA/O=EOP @ EOP [ CEA 1
READ: UNKNOWN
TEXT:
Tom & Elena -- the Furchtgott-Roth and Stolba book "Women's Figures" is
having a big press event today at AEI.
(This is the book George will
wrote about in his column last week, which ridicules the idea of a gender
pay gap.)
I suspect this means there will be more articles and press
attention over the week.
I really think we need to respond to this
publicly in some way.
Have you guys talked about this at DPC? How about
an editorial somewhere, at a minimum? Let's chat about this, if it seems
useful.
Becky
�ARMS Email System
Page 1 of 15
RECORD TYPE: PRESIDENTIAL
(NOTES
~IL)
CREATOR: Andrea Kane ( CN=Andrea Kane/OU=OPD/O=EOP [ OPD 1 )
CREATION DATE/TIME:29-MAR-1999 12:51:12.00
SUBJECT:
Updated Welfare Reform Accomplishments
TO: Beach-Benjamin ( Beach-Benjamin @ dol.gov @ inet
READ: UNKNOWN
[ UNKNOWN 1 )
TO: Heyman-Stephen ( Heyman-Stephen @ dol.gov @ inet [ UNKNOWN 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Mastrand ( Mastrand @ opm.gov @ inet
READ: UNJ(NOWN
[ UNKNOWN 1 )
TO: mkharfen ( mkharfen @ acf.dhhs.gov @ inet [ UNKNOWN 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: pbravo ( pbravo @ acf.dhhs.gov @ inet [ UNKNOWN 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: zina.pierre
READ: UNKNOWN
zina.pierre @ sba.gov @ inet
[ UNKNOWN 1 )
TO: Daniel I. Werfel ( CN=Daniel I. Werfel/OU=OMB/O=EOP @ EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: pruggles ( pruggles @ osaspe.dhhs.gov @ inet [ UNKNOWN 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: dahm-emily ( dahm-emily @ dol.gov @ inet [ UNKNOWN 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: kamela-william ( kamela-william @ dol.gov @ inet
READ: UNKNOWN
[ UNKNOWN 1 )
TO: art_foley ( art_foley @ fcs.usda.gov @ inet [ UNKNOWN 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: corine.hegland ( corine.hegland @ ost.dot.gov @ inet [ UNKNOWN 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: deborah_greenstein ( deborah_greenstein @ hud.gov @ inet [ UNKNOWN 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: michael.barr ( michael.barr @ ms01.do.treas.sprint.com @ inet [ UNKNOWN 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: betsy.myers ( betsy.myers @ sba.gov @ inet [ UNKNOWN 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: nancy_kirshner-rodriguez ( nancy_kirshner-rodriguez @ hud.gov @ inet [ UNKNOWN 1
READ:UNKNOWN
TO: ljenning ( ljenning @ dol.gov @ inet [ UNKNOWN 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Dario J. Gomez ( CN=Dario J. Gomez/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
�Page 2 of 15
ARMS Email System
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Andrew R. Feldman ( CN=Andrew R. Feldman/OU=CEA/O=EOP @ EOP [' CEA 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: William H. White Jr.
READ: UNKNOWN
( cN=william H. White Jr./OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
TO: YAMIN_S ( YAMIN S @ Al @ CD @ VAXGTWY [ UNKNOWN 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
(OMB)
TO: Barbara D. woolley ( CN=Barbara D. Woolley/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO, 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Joseph C. Fanaroff ( CN=Joseph C. Fanaroff/OU=WHO/O=EOP [ UNKNOWN 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Robin J. Bachman ( CN=Robin J. Bachman/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Cynthia A. Rice ( CN=Cynthia A. Rice/OU=OPD/O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Elena Kagan ( CN=Elena Kagan/OU=OPD/O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: efurd-laura ( efurd-laura @ dol.gov [ UNKNOWN 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Stephen_J. Yank ( Stephen_J._Yank @ hud.gov [ UNKNOWN 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Melissa G. Green ( CN=Melissa G. Green/OU=OPD/O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: edahl ( edahl @ os.dhhs.gov @ inet
READ: UNKNOWN
[ UNKNOWN 1 )
TO: Ahyman ( Ahyman @ os.dhhs.gov @ inet
READ: UNKNOWN
[ UNKNOWN 1 )
TO: eparker ( eparker @ acf.dhhs.gov @ inet
READ: UNKNOWN
[ UNKNOWN 1 )
TO: Lori Schack ( CN=Lori Schack/OU=OMB/O=EOP @ EOP
READ: UNKNOWN
[ OMB 1 )
TO: Daniel J. Chenok ( CN=Daniel J. Chenok/OU=OMB/O=EOP @ EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: cpian ( cpian @ osaspe.dhhs.gov @ inet
READ: UNKNOWN
[ UNKNOWN 1 )
TO: xavier_briggs ( xavier_briggs @ hud.gov @ inet
READ: UNKNOWN
[ UNKNOWN 1 )
TO: bonny_o'neil ( bonny_o'neil @ fcs.usda.gov @ inet
READ: UNKNOWN
[ UNKNOWN 1 )
john_f._bohm @ hud.gov @ inet [ UNKNOWN 1 )
�ARMS Email System
Page 3 of 15
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: linda. lawson ( linda. lawson @ ost.dot.gov @ inet [ UNKNOWN]
READ: UNKNOWN
)
TO: irma. tucker ( irma. tucker @ treas.sprint.com @ inet [ UNKNOWN]
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: uhalde-raymond ( uhalde-raymond @ dol.gov @ inet
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: JMONAHAN ( JMONAHAN @ ACF.DHHS.GOV @ inet
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: dana.colarulli
READ: UNKNOWN
[ UNKNOWN]
( dana.colarulli @ sba.gov @ inet
TO: Charles M. Brain (
READ: UNKNOWN
C~=Charles
[ UNKNOWN]
)
)
)
[ UNKNOWN]
)
M. Brain/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO ] )
TO: Anil Kakani ( CN=Anil Kakani/OU=OMB/O=EOP @ EOP [ OMB ]
READ: UNKNOWN
)
TO: Robert F. Schoeni ( CN=Robert F. Schoeni/OU=CEA/O=EOP @ EOP [ CEA]
READ: UNKNOWN
)
TO: Jack A. Smalligan ( CN=Jack A. Smalligan/OU=OMB/O=EOP @ EOP [ OMB ] )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Lee Ann Brackett ( CN=Lee Ann Brackett/O=OVP @ OVP [ UNKNOWN]
READ: UNKNOWN
)
TO: Chandler G. Spaulding ( CN=Chandler G. Spaulding/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO]
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: J. Eric Gould ( CN=J. Eric Gould/OU=OPD/O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD ] )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Laura Emmett ( CN=Laura Emmett/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO]
READ: UNKNOWN
)
TO: Bruce N. Reed ( CN=Bruce N. Reed/OU=OPD/O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD ] )
READ: UNKNOWN
TEXT:
Here's updated document for your use -- it's also posted on White House
welfare reform web site
==================== ATTACHMENT
1 ====================
ATT CREATION TIME/DATE:
0 00:00:00.00
TEXT:
Unable to ,convert ARMS_EXT: [ATTACH.D87]MAIL452556994.036 to ASCII,
The following is a HEX DUMP:
FF575043BA060000010A02010000000205000000AD680000000200000D23A865B05E74DDF7296E
IB5674C72BFF03280EAF2A215F85A9BAAD025E73CA2F56C41BFOB5E58A46AE5IFBE8FCDDD8B6C9
972C505BID7239D26E90F3B19D8EF5C9B8124CF7CEA1394EB437F7A4A168D811C99DE9EDDB5AOE
OE632AC754522301DA73F8698E5EF761D460CBFB9DIDFFA450083849AA67EBBOA242677DF6D9C8
90D037B907FDAC3D32069C274E77594E78CAD697E849AD3FFIC7ABB25AEF8C5D20DB65BDE779CB
)
�03/23/99
CLINTON-GORE ACCOMPLISHMENTS
REFORMING WELFARE
On August 22, 1996, President Clinton signed the Personal Responsibility and
Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act, fulfilling his longtime commitment to 'end
welfare as we know it. ' As the President said upon signing, "". this legislation
provides an historic opportunity to end welfare as we know it and transform our
broken welfare system by promoting the fondamental values of work,
responsibility, and family. "
TRANSFORMING THE BROKEN WELFARE SYSTEM
•
Overhauling the Welfare System with the Personal Responsibility Act: In 1996, the
President signed a bipartisan welfare plan that is dramatically changing the nation's
welfare system into one that requires work in exchange for time-limited assistance. The
law contains strong work requirements, performance bonuses to reward states for moving
welfare recipients into jobs and reducing illegitimacy, state maintenance of effort
requirements, comprehensive child support enforcement, and supports for families
moving from welfare to work -- including increased funding for child care. State
strategies are making a real difference in the success of welfare reform, specifically in
job placement, child care and transportation.
Law Builds on the Administration's Welfare Reform Strategy: Even before the.
Personal Responsibility Act became law, many states were well on their way to changing
their welfare programs to jobs programs. By granting Federal waivers, the Clinton
Administration allowed 43 states -- more than all previous Administrations combined -to require work, time-limit assistance, make work pay, improve child support
enforcement, and encourage parental responsibility. The vast majority of states have
chosen to continue or build on their welfare demonstration projects approved by the
Clinton Administration.
Welfare Rolls Decline as More Recipients go to Work: In January 1999, the President
released state-by-state data (from September 1998) showing that welfare caseloads are at
their lowest level in 30 years and that the welfare rolls have fallen by nearly half since he
took office. Since January 1993, 36 states have had caseload declines of more than 40
percent and nationwide the rolls have fallen by 44 percent, from 14.1 million to just
below 8 million. This historic decline occurred in response to the Administration's
grants of Federal waivers to 43 states, the provisions ofthe new welfare reform law, and
the strong economy. Recent information released by the Department of Health and
Human Services also shows that the percentage of welfare recipients working has tripled
since 1992, that an estimated 1.5 million people who were on welfare in 1997 were
working in 1998, and that all states met the first overall work participation rates required
under the welfare reform law.
�Automated Records M.
Hex-Dump Canagement SYste
MOVING PEOPLE FROM WELFARE TO WORK
on version
m
•
Mobilizing the Business Community: At the President's urging, the Welfare to Work
Partnership was launched in May 1997 to lead the national business effort to hire people
from the welfare rolls. Founded with 105 participating businesses, the Partnership grew
to 5,000 within one year, and in his 1999 State of the Union address, the President
announced that the Partnership now inCludes over 10,000 businesses who have hired
hundreds of thousands of people. Since 1997, these businesses have hired over 410,000
welfare recipients, more than meeting the challenge the President set in May of 1998. The
Partnership provides technical assistance and support to businesses around the country,
including: a toll-free number, a web site, a quarterly newsletter, and a "Blueprint for
Business" hiring manual. The Partnership also published The Road to Retention, a
report of companies that have found higher retention rates for former welfare recipients
for other new hires, and strategies they used to achieve this success.
•
Connecting Small Businesses with New Workers: The Small Business Administration
is addressing the unique and vital role of small businesses who employ over one-half of
the private workforce, by helping small businesses throughout the country connect with
job training organizations and job-ready welfare recipients. In addition, SBA provides
training and assistance to welfare recipients who wish to start their own businesses.
SBA provides assistance to businesses through its 1-800-U-ASK-SBA number, as well
through its network of small business and women's business centers, one-stop capital
shops, district offices, and its home page.
•
Mobilizing Civic, Religious and Non-profit Groups: The Vice President created the
Welfare to Work Coalition to Sustain Success, a coalition of national civic, seryice, and
faith-based groups committed to helping former welfare recipients succeed in the
workforce. Working in part~ership with public agencies and employers, Coalition
members provide mentoring, job training, child care, transportation, and other support to
help these new workers with the transition to self sufficiency. Charter members of the
Coalition include: Alpha Kappa Alpha, the Boys and Girls Clubs of America, the Baptist
Joint Committee, Goodwill, Salvation Army, the United Way, Women's Missionary
Union, the YMCA, the YWCA, and other civic and faith-based groups.
•
Doing Our Fair Share with the Federal Government's Hiring Initiative: Under the
Clinton Administration, the Federal workforce is the smallest it has been in thirty years.
Yet, this Administration also believes that the Federal government, as the nation's largest
employer, must lead by example. The President asked the Vice President to oversee the
Federal government's hiring initiative in which Federal agencies have committed to
directly hire at least 10,000 welfare recipients in the next four years. On March I st, the
Vice President announced that the federal government has hired over 10,000 welfare
recipients nearly two years ahead of schedule. As a part of this effort, the White House
pledged to hire six welfare recipients and has already exceeded this goal.
•
Funds to Help Move More People from Welfare to Work, with a Focus on Fathers:
Because of the President's leadership, the 1997 Balanced Budget Act included the total
funding requested by the President for the creation of his $3 billion welfare to work fund.
�Automated Records Management Systerr
Hex-Dump Conversion
This program helps states and local communities move long-tenn welfare recipients, and
certain non-custodial parents, into lasting, unsubsidized jobs_ These funds can be used for
job creation, job placement and job retention efforts, including wage subsidies to private
employers and other critical post-employment support services. The Department of
Labor provides oversight but most of the dollars are placed, through the Private Industry
Councils, in the hands of the localities who are on the front lines of the welfare refonn
effort. In addition, 25 percent of the funds are awarded by the Department of Labor on
a competitive basis to support innovative welfare to work projects. The President
announced the first round of 49 competitive grants in May, and the Vice President
announced the second round of75 competitive grants in November 1998. In January
1999, the Department of Labor announced the availability of $240 million in competitive
grants for FY 1999. These funds will support innovative local welfare-to-work strategies
for noncustodial parents, individuals with limited English proficiency, disabilities,
substance abuse pro~lems, or a history of domestic violence.
The President's FY 2000 budget includes $1 billion for the Welfare-to-Work program to
help 200,000 long-tenn welfare recipients in high-poverty areas move into lasting
unsubsidized employment. This is an extension of the two-year $3 billion
Welfare-to-Work program the President secured in the Balanced Budget Act. The
initiative, as reauthorized, will provide at least $150 million to ensure that every state helps
fathers fulfill their responsibilities by working, paying child support, and playing a
responsible part in their children's lives. Under this proposal, states and communities
will use a minimum of 20 percent of their fonnula funds to provide job placement and job
retention assistance to low-income fathers who sign personal responsibility contracts
committing them to work and pay child support. This effort will further increase child
support collections, which have risen 80 percent since the President took office, from $8
billion in 1992 to $14.4 billion in 1998. Remaining funds will go toward assisting
long-tenn welfare recipients with the greatest barriers to employment to move into lasting
jobs. The reauthorized program also will double the welfare-to-work funding available
for tribes.
•
Tax Credits for Employers: The Welfare to Work Tax Credit, enacted in the 1997
. Balanced Budget Act, provides a credit equal to 35 percent of the first $10,000 in wages
in the first year of employment, and 50 percent of the first $10,000 in wages in the second
year, to encourage the hiring and retention of long tenn welfare recipients. This credit
complements the Work Opportunity Tax Credit, which provides a credit of up to $2,400
for the first year of wages for eight groups of job seekers. The Omnibus Budget Act
included an extension through June 30, 1999 and the President's FY 2000 budget
proposes to extend both credits for an additional year.
•
Welfare-to-Work Housing Vouchers: In his FY 1999 budget, the President proposed
$283 million for 50,000 new housing vouchers for welfare recipients who need housing
assistance to get or keep ajob, and Congress approved full funding for this new initiative.
Families will use these housing vouchers to move closer to a new job, to reduce a long
commute, or to secure more stable housing to eliminate emergencies that keep them from
getting to work every day on time. Nearly all of these vouchers will be awarded to
communities on a competitive basis, to communities who create cooperative efforts
among their housing, welfare and employment agencies to assure the most effective use
�Automated Records Management System
Hex-Dump Conversion
of this flexible new tool to help people make the transition from welfare to work. The
President's FY 2000 budget provides $430 million for 75,000 welfare-to-work vouchers,
including $144 million in new funds for 25,000 additional vouchers.
•
Welfare-to-Work Transportation: One ofthe biggest barriers facing people who
move from welfare to work -- in cities and in rural areas -- is finding transportation to get
to jobs, training programs and child care centers. Few welfare recipients own cars.
Existing mass transit does not provide adequate links to many suburban jobs at all, or
within a reasonable commute time. In addition, many entry level jobs require evening or
weekend hours that are poorly served by existing transit routes. To help those on welfare
get to work, President Clinton proposed a $100 million a year welfare to work
transportation plan as part of his ISTEA reauthorization bill. The Transportation Equity
Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) authorized $750 million over five years for the
President's initiative and reverse commute grants. Of this amount, $50 million is
guaranteed funding in FY 1999, rising to $150 million in 2003. The Omnibus Budget Act
included $75 million for this program in FY 1999 and the Department of Transportation
is currently reviewing applications for this first year funding. The President's budget
proposes to double funding for FY 2000, bringing it to the full authorized level of $150
million. The Job Access competitive grants will assist states and localities in developing
flexible transportation alternatives, such as van services, for welfare recipients and other
low income workers.
•
Eliminating Anti-Work and Anti-FamiJy Rules that Denied Families Health Coverage: In
August 1998, the President eliminated a vestige of the old welfare system by announcing
that the Department of Health and Human Services will revise its regulations to allow all
states to provide Medicaid coverage to working, two-parent families who meet State
income eligibility. Under the old welfare regulations, adults in two-parent families who
worked more than 100 hours per month could not receive Medicaid regardless of income
level, while there were no such restrictions on single-parent families. Because these
regulations provided disincentives to marriage and full-time work, the Administration
allowed a number of states to waive this rule. The new regulation eliminates this rule
for all States, providing health coverage for more than 130,000 working families to help
them stay employed and off welfare.
PROMOTING PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY
•
Enforcing Child Support -- 80% Increase in Collections: The Clinton Administration
collected a record $14.4 billion in child support in 1998 through tougher enforcement, an
increase of$6.4 billion, or 80% since 1992. Not only are collections up, but the number
of families that are actually receiving child support has also increased. In 1997, the
number of child support cases with collections rose to 4.2 million, an increase of 48%
fom 2.8 million in 1992. In addition, a new collection system proposed by the President
in 1994 and enacted as part of the 1996 welfare reform law located one million
delinquent parents in its first nine months of operation. This National Directory of New
Hires helps track parents across state lines by enabling child support officials to match
records of delinquent parents with wage records from throughout the nation.
Approximately one-third of all child support cases involve parents living in different
�Automated Records Management System
Hex-Dump Conversion
states. In June 1998, the President signed the Deadbeat Parents Punishment Act, a law
based on his 1996 proposal for tougher penalties for parents who repeatedly fail to
support children living in another state or who flee across state lines to avoid supporting
them. This new law creates two new felonies, with penalties of up to two years in
prison, for egregious child support evaders who travel across state or country lines to
evade child support obligations, or who have an unpaid obligation to a child living in
another state that is more than $10,000 or has remained unpaid for more than two years.
Increasing Parental Responsibility: The President's unprecedented and sustained
campaign to ensure parents financially support their children is working. Paternity
establishment, often the crucial first step in child support cases, has dramatically
increased, due in large part to the in-hospital voluntary paternity establishment program
begun in 1994 by the Clinton Administration. In 1997, the number of paternities
established or acknowledged rose to a record 1.3 million, two and a half times the 1992
figure of 512,000. In addition to tougher enforcement including a strong partnership
with states, President Clinton has taken executive action including: directing the Treasury
Department to collect past-due child support from Federal payments including Federal
income tax refunds and employee salaries, and taking steps to deny Federal loans to any
delinquent parents. The Federal government collected over $1.1 billion in delinquent
child support from federal income tax refunds for tax year 1997, a 70 percent increase
since 1992. The welfare reform law contains tough child support measures that President
Clinton has long supported including: the national new hire reporting system; streamlined
paternity establishment; uniform interstate child support laws; computerized state-wide
collections; and tough new penalties. These five measures are projected to increase child
support collections by an additional $24 billion over the next ten years.
•
Breaking the Cycle of Dependency -- Preventing Teen Pregnancy: Significant
components of the President's comprehensive effort to reduce teen pregnancy became law
when the President signed the 1996 Personal Responsibility Act. The law requires
unmarried minor parents to stay in school and live at home or in a supervised setting;
encourages "second chance homes" to provide teen parents with the skills and support
they need; and provides $50 million a year in new funding for state abstinence education
activities. Since 1993, the Clinton Administration has supported innovative and
promising teen pregnancy prevention strategies, including working with boys and young
men on pregnancy prevention strategies. The National Campaign to Prevent Teen
Pregnancy, a private nonprofit organization, wa!l formed in response to the President's
1995 State of the Union. In 1997, the President announced the National Strategy to
Prevent Teen Pregnancy, mandated in the welfare reform law. The first annual report on
this Strategy reported that HHS-supported programs already reach at least 31 percent or
1,470 communities in the United States. Notably, data shows we are making progress in
reducing teen pregnancy -- teen births have fallen six years in a row, by 15 percent from
1991 to 1997. And, teen pregnancy rates are at their lowest level in 20 years.
�Automated Records Management System
Hex-Dump Conversion
•
RESTORING FAIRNESS AND PROTECTING THE MOST VULNERABLE
The President made a commitment to fix several provisions in the welfare refonn law that had
nothing to do with moving people from welfare to work. In 1997, the President fought for and
ultimately was successful in ensuring that the Balanced Budget Act protects the most vulnerable.
In 1998, the President continued to reverse unfair cuts in benefits to legal immigrants. The
Administration's FY 2000 budget would build on this progress by restoring important disability,
health, and nutrition benefits to additional categories of legal immigrants, at a cost of $1.3 billion
over five years.
•
Disability and Health: The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 restored disability and health
benefits to 420,000 legal immigrants who were in this country before welfare refonn
became law (August 22, 1996), at an estimated cost of $11.5 billion. The
Administration's new budget would restore eligibility for SSI and Medicaid to legal
immigrants who enter the country after that date ifthey have been in the U.S. for five
years and become disabled after entering the United States. This proposal would cost
approximately $930 million and assist an estimated 54,000 legal immigrants by 2004,
about half of whom would be elderly.
•
Nutritional Assistance: The Agricultural Research Act of 1998 provided Food Stamps
for 225,000 legal immigrant children, senior citizens, and people with disabilities who
came to the United States by August 22, 1996. The Administration's budget would
extend this provision by allowing legal immigrants in the United States on August 22,
1996 who subsequently reach age 65 to be eligible for Food Stamps at cost of $60
million.
•
Childrens' Health Care and Maternal Care for Pregnant Women: States currently
can provide health coverage to immigrant children who .entered the country before August
22, 1996. The President's FY 2000 budget would give states the option to provide health
coverage to legal immigrant children who entered the country after August 22, 1996.
Under this proposal, states could provide health coverage to those children through
Medicaid or their CHIP allotment. The proposal would cost $220 million and serve
approximately 55,000 children by FY 2004. Furthennore, the budget proposes to give
states the option to provide Medicaid coverage to legal immigrant women who entered
the country after August 22, 1996 and subsequently became pregnant. Such coverage
would help reduce the number of high-risk pregnancies, ensure healthier children, and
lower the cost of emergency Medicaid deliveries. This proposal would cost $105 million
and serve approximately 23,000 women by FY 2004.
•
Helping PeopJe Who Want to Work but Can't Find a Job:
The Balanced Budget Act
(BBA), as amended by the Agricultural Research Act, also restored $1.3 billion in food
stamp cuts. The welfare refonn law restricted food stamps for able-bodied childless
adults to only 3 out of every 36 months, unless they were working. This move ignored
the fact that finding a job often takes time. The BBA provided funds for work slots and
food stamp benefits to help those who are willing to work but, through no fault of their
own, have not yet found employment. In addition, the BBA allows states to exempt up to
15 percent of the food stamp recipients (70,000 individuals monthly) who would
�otherwise be denied benefits as a result of the "3 in 36" limit.
Automated Records Management System
Hex-Dump Conversion
�ARMS Email System
RECORD TYPE: PRESIDENTIAL
Page 1 of3
(NOTES MAIL)
CREATOR: Lisa M. Jones ( CN=Lisa M. Jones/OU=OMB/O=EOP [ OMB 1 )
CREATION DATE/TIME:31-MAR-1999 13:18:45.00
SUBJECT:
Headsup
TO: Michael Deich ( CN=Michael Deich/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Mickey Ibarra ( CN=Mickey Ibarra/OU=WHO/O=EOP@EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Michael Waldman ( CN=Michael Waldman/OU=WHO/O=EOP@EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Elena Kagan ( CN=Elena Kagan/OU=OPD/O=EOP@EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Bruce N. Reed ( CN=Bruce N. Reed/OU=OPD/O=EOP@EOP [ OPDl
READ: UNKNOWN
)
TO: Minyon Moore ( CN=Minyon Moore/OU=WHO/O=EOP@EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Ann F. Lewis ( CN=Ann F. Lewis/OU=WHO/O=EOP@EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Ron Klain ( CN=Ron Klain/O=OVP@OVP [ UNKNOWN 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Douglas B. Sosnik ( CN=Douglas B. Sosnik/OU=WHO/O=EOP@EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Barbara Chow ( CN=Barbara Chow/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Janet L. Yellen ( CN=Janet L. Yellen/OU=CEA/O=EOP@EOP [ CEA 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Barry J. Toiv ( CN=Barry J. Toiv/OU=WHO/O=EOP@EOP
READ: UNKNOWN
[ WHO 1 )
TO: Gene B. Sperling ( CN=Gene B. Sperling/OU=OPD/O=EOP@EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Mary E. Cahill ( CN=Mary E. Cahill/OU=WHO/O=EOP@EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Sally Katzen ( CN=Sally Katzen/OU=OPD/O=EOP@EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Thurgood Marshall Jr ( CN=Thurgood Marshall Jr/OU=WHO/O=EOP@EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Lawrence J. Stein ( CN=Lawrence J. Stein/OU=WHO/O=EOP@EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Maria Echaveste ( CN=Maria Echaveste/OU=WHO/O=EOP@EOP [ WHO 1 )
�ARMS Email System
Page 2 of3
READ: UNKNOWN
CC: Stuart Shapiro ( CN=Stuart Shapiro/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TEXT:
Memo was signed on Friday, March 26, 1999.
MEMORANDUM FOR JOHN PODESTA
THROUGH:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Jacob J. Lew
Sylvia Mathews
Don Arbuckle
Heads-Up Clearance of Regulations
Within the next several days we will be clearing four high profile
regulations.
DO
HHS
Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) final regulation from
We have completed our review of the Department of Health and Human
ServiceD,s (HHSD,) Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF)
regulations on Friday, March 26th. This final rule implements the 1996
welfare reform statute. The TANF rule as proposed in November 1997,
generated significant criticism from States and advocates for poor
families. They argued that the proposal was overly burdensome, discouraged
State innovation, and demonstrated a mistrust of how States will exercise
the discretion that the statute intended to provide.
In response to these
comments, HHS has revised the final rule significantly to increase
flexibility and reduce burden while maintaining accountability.
The final rule will likely receive significant attention.
Reaction is expected to be mostly favorable given the changes from the
NPRM, although the rule could still receive criticism for excessive
requirements on States. A rollout is being planned by DPC for mid-April.
DO
OFHEO Risk Based Capital Regulation
OMB completed its review of the Office of Federal Housing
Enterprise Oversight Risk-Based Capital Regulation for Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac on Thursday, March 25th. The rule was sent to the. Hill
Friday afternoon, March 26th. At about the same time, OFHEO issued a
press release.
Congress will have 15 calendar days to comment on the rule
before it is published in the Federal Register and the public will have
120 days after that to comment on the proposed rule.
The rule specifies the risk-based capital stress test that will
determine the amount of capital each Enterprise is required to hold to
maintain positive capital throughout a ten-year period of economic
stress. There is great interest in Congress and the financial community
in seeing the proposed rule and determining its impact on the Enterprises
and mortgages markets.
Fannie Mae has publically expressed concern about
the possible impact on its operations and mortgage markets, while Freddie
Mac has called for its publication.
�ARMS Email System
DO
Workforce Investment Act (WIA) Regulations from DOL
On Thursday, March 25th.OMB completed its review of the Department
of LaborD,s (DOL) interim final regulation implementing the Workforce
Investment Act (WIA) of 1998. Based on the PresidentD,s G.I. Bill for
AmericaD,s Workers proposal, WIA reforms and streamlines the nation's
employment and training system by consolidating numerous publicly funded
job training and employment .programs.
Key WIA reforms include the
development and implementation of a network of one-stop centers that
provides a central point of entry to services, and individual.training
accounts, or vouchers, to finance adult training.
The interim final rule may receive some attention from locally
elected officials who have lobbied DOL for a greater role in the
governance of the system. Also, members of both the minority and majority
on Hill sent a letter to the President (11/24/98) stressing the importance
of coordination between the Federal agencies in providing services though
the one-stop.
In response to this letter, DOL conducted extensive
consultations with its Federal partners and State and locals in developing
this interim final rule, and will continue this consultative process
during WIA implementation, which begins on July 1, 1999. DOL expects to
publish a final rule in December 1999.
DO
DOL D&HelpersD8 Regulation
OMB will be completing its review of the Department of LaborD,s
proposed D&helpersD8 regulation during the early part of the week of
March 29th. The proposed regulation governs the use of semi-skilled
helpers, who assist skilled journeymen on Davis-Bacon construction
projects.
The proposal would place into regulation the DepartmentD,s
current policy of strictly limiting the use of helpers. This issue has
been the subject of Congressional riders and court decisions over the past
15 years, which for all but a short period in 1992-93 also had the effect
of strictly limiting the use of helpers on Federal construction contracts.
Please let us know if you have any questions or concerns on any of these
regulations.
Page 3 of3
�ARMS Email System
Page 1 of II
RECORD TYPE: PRESIDENTIAL
(NOTES MAIL)
CREATOR: Melissa N. Benton ( CN=Melissa N. Benton/OU=OMB/O=EOP [ OMB 1 )
CREATION DATE/TIME:31-MAR-1999 16:31:44.00
SUBJECT:
LRM MNB37 - - REVISED LABOR Draft Bill on Alien Labor Certification User F
TO: Robert J. Pellicci ( CN=Robert J. Pellicci/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Janet R. Forsgren ( CN=Janet R. Forsgren/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Courtney B. Timberlake ( CN=Courtney B. Timberlake/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: David J. Haun ( CN=David J. Haun/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Susanne D. Lind
READ: UNKNOWN
[ OMB 1 )
CN=Susanne D. Lind/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
TO: Rosemarie W. Dale ( CN=Rosemarie W. Dale/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Robert F. Mahaffie ( CN=Robert F. Mahaffie/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Karen Tramontano ( CN=Karen Tramontano/OU=WHO/O=EOP@EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Harry E. Moran ( CN=Harry E. Moran/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: J. Eric Gould ( CN=J. Eric Gould/OU=OPD/O=EOP@EOP
READ: UNKNOWN
[ OPD 1 )
TO: Robert F. Schoeni ( CN=Robert F. Schoeni/OU=CEA/O=EOP@EOP [ CEA 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Andrea Kane ( CN=Andrea Kane/OU=OPD/O=EOP@EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Larry R. Matlack ( CN=Larry R. Matlack/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: James J. Jukes
READ: UNKNOWN
OMB 1 )
( CN=James J. Jukes/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
TO: Robert G. Damus ( CN=Robert G. Damus/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Steven M. Mertens ( CN=Steven M. Mertens/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Jennifer E. Brown ( CN=Jennifer E. Brown/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Irene Bueno ( CN=Irene Bueno/OU=OPD/O=EOP@EOP [ OPD 1 )
�ARMS Email System
Page 2 of 11
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Peter Rundlet ( CN=Peter Rundlet/OU=WHO/O=EOP@EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Mark J. Schwartz ( CN=Mark J. Schwartz/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ:UNKNOWN
TO: Sarah S. Lee ( CN=Sarah S. Lee/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Elena Kagan ( CN=Elena Kagan/OU=OPD/O=EOP@EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Justine F. Rodriguez ( CN=Justine F. Rodriguez/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1
READ:UNKNOWN
TO: Cordelia W. Reimers ( CN=Cordelia W. Reimers/OU=CEA/O=EOP@EOP [ CEA 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Debra J. Bond ( CN=Debra J. Bond/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Barry White ( CN=Barry White/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
LRM STATE ( LRM STATE [ UNKNOWN 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
LRM TREASURY ( LRM TREASURY [ UNKNOWN 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
LRM COMMERCE ( LRM COMMERCE [ UNKNOWN 1 )
READ:UNKNOWN
LRM Small Business Administration ( LRM Small Business Administration [ UNKNOWN 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
LRM JUSTICE ( LRM JUSTICE
READ: UNKNOWN
[ UNKNOWN 1 )
TEXT:
NOTE TO EOP STAFF: YOU WILL NOT RECEIVE A HARD COPY OF THIS LRM.
LRM ID: MNB37
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
washington, D.C. 20503-0001
Wednesday, March 31, 1999
LEGISLATIVE REFERRAL MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
Reference
OMB CONTACT:
SUBJECT:
Legislative Liaison Officer - See Distribution below
Janet R. Forsgren (for) Assistant Director for Legislative
Melissa N. Benton
PHONE: (202) 395-7887 FAX: (202) 395-6148
REVISED LABOR Draft Bill on Alien Labor Certification
�ARMS Email System
Page 3 of 11
User Fees
DEADLINE:
1 p.m.
Friday, April 2, 1999
In accordance with OMB Circular A-19, OMB requests the views of your
agency on the above subject before advising on its relationship to the
program of the President.
Please advise us if this item will affect
direct spending or receipts for purposes of the "Pay-As-You-Go" provisions
of Title XIII of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990.
COMMENTS: The deadline is firm.
DISTRIBUTION LIST
AGENCIES:
61-JUSTICE - Dennis Burke - (202) 514-2141
118-TREASURY - Richard S. Carro - ,(202) 622-0650
25-COMMERCE - Michael A. Levitt - (202) 482-3151
107-Small Business Administration - Mary Kristine Swedin 114-STATE - Paul Rademacher - (202) 647-4463
EOP:
Barry White
Larry R. Matlack
Debra J. Bond
Andrea Kane
Cordelia W. Reimers
Robert F. Schoeni
Justine F. Rodriguez
J. Eric Gould
Elena Kagan
Harry E. Moran
Sarah S. Lee
Karen Tramontano
Mark J. Schwartz
Robert F. Mahaffie
Peter Rundlet
Rosemarie W. Dale
Irene Bueno
Susanne D. Lind
Robert G. Damus
Jennifer E. Brown
David J. Haun
Steven M. Mertens
Courtney B. Timberlake
Janet R. Forsgren
James J. Jukes
LRM ID: MNB37
SUBJECT:
Certification User Fees
RESPONSE TO
LEGISLATIVE REFERRAL
MEMORANDUM
REVISED LABOR
(202) 205-6700
Draft Bill on Alien Labor
If your response to this request for views is short (e.g., concur/no
comment), we prefer that you respond bye-mail or by faxing us this
response sheet.
If the response is short and you prefer to call, please
call the branch-wide line shown below (NOT the analyst's line) to leave a
message with a legislative assistant.
You may also respond by:
(1) calling the analyst/attorney's direct line (you will be
�ARMS Email System
Page 4 of 11
connected to voice mail if the analyst does not answer); or
(2) sending us a memo or letter
Please include the LRM number shown above, and the subject shown below.
TO:
Melissa N. Benton Phone:
395-7887
Fax:
395-6148
Office of Management and Budget
Branch-Wide Line (to reach legislative assistant): 395-7362
(Date)
FROM:
(Name)
(Agency)
(Telephone)
The following is the response of our agency to your request for views on
the above-captioned subject:
Concur
No Objection
No Comment
See proposed edits on pages
Other:
FAX RETURN of
pages, attached to this response sheet
==================== ATTACHMENT
1 ====================
ATT CREATION TIME/DATE:
0 00:00:00.00
TEXT:
Unable to convert ARMS_EXT: [ATTACH.D43]MAIL44905230S.136 to ASCII,
The following is a HEX DUMP:
FF575043CF040000010A02010000000205000000353C0000000200003B504153E056BB3909224F
COF82CC5AC039BB246305270212A2EOBCD7435504E61FC6933301D01150BC90D435BEB2F7328DO
972851E88DA346E14204A2195B711E29D9B56857573C7C7C5EC2Dl22FFEBFDC55135B~93697144
50B537F30F3E10960ED25D5368AA60813C5952F28A8081FOAA332F5460A3COEFD13B7D5EB38B39
27B1B372AB12793126C703E53A23CB5A5B74F584575C4D6262DF4AB39DE1D95441F352F890BCE1
23811F4D797FCA3DB630C5536415BC3FECE59D98618996AFFEA8B3BE09EOCF15B8DOC972BFAA56
1COOB2CADA5F8FC9407EAE28162296534F5CEA463DCAF6B5298546CEA710C23F9112333B15E2F3
440B33Al12547BEA322EEE53EB38725FADC3F6BC184C10DC6DFD639BCDB98EC49768887DC82640
A5A7C4F19EBACE43E86AE121497FBB41354F8EB06CA985B23ECFD850407225DC4CD715C36D40C1
43FC26FC6565B8237752C76321DBE8C46CBOD5DOF65D3359E29F5580852FEABBC750E4701A617F
CB76B7E6786CD04B85EEODC201313D969187FE044ACFFF9CD33FBD3B8869D9258CB283FD12C212
978D1D544BEBC5AA1854296946E95C6CB52720946D4A10560B726E6262B06C605FCE25AB54C73C
AB7348A59969C206BC20DOA4B62FFA4086A05A968ADB43AE3F3D80708ACE3C9D45D1F9B9778000
0144B4C7BE02000C000000000000000000000008230100000021010000A8020000005501000000
4EOOOOOOC903000009250100000006000000170400000B3002000000280000001D040000087701
000000400000004504000008340100000014000000850400000802010000000F00000099040000
084E0100000002000000A8040000085E010000000COOOOOOAA04000008100100000002000000B6
040000096D0100000017000000B804000000980000000000000000000000000000000000000000
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
�Automated Records Management System
Hex-Dump Conversion
DRAFT 3/31/99
SUBTITLE G-- ALIEN LABOR CERTIFICATION USER FEES
SEC.
ESTABLISHMENT OF FEES.
(a) PERMANENT IMMIGRANT APPLICATION FEES.-- Section 212(a)(5)(A) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(5)(A) is amended-(1) in clause (i), by-(A) striking "and" at the end of subclause (I),
(B) striking the period at the end of subclause (II) and inserting ", and",
and
(C) by adding at the end the following:
"(III) the employer has submitted an application for certification of
the alien under this paragraph and has paid an application fee in
accordance with clause (iv)."; and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
"(iv)(I) The Secretary of Labor shall impose a fee of$500 on an employer
that-"(aa) submits an application to the Secretary of Labor for
certification under this subparagraph on or after October 1, 1999, or
"(bb) requests that the Secretary of Labor review an application
1
�Automated Records Management Sysfem
Hex·Dump Conversion
that was submitted to the Secretary of Labor for certification under this
subparagraph prior to October 1, 1999, using the same review procedures
applicable to applications submitted under sub-subclause (aa).
"(II)(aa) The employer submitting the application under this subparagraph
shall not require or accept payment, directly or indirectly, of the fees established
pursuant to subclause (I) by the alien who is the beneficiary of the certifioation.
"(bb) If the Secretary of Labor determines, after notice and opportunity for
a hearing, that a violation of sub-subclause (aa) has occurred, the Secretary of
Labor may impose a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed $1,000 per violation
and an administrative order requiring the return of any amounts received in
violation of sub-subclause (aa) to the alien, or if the alien cannot be located, to the
general fund of the Treasury.
"(III) Fees collected under this clause shall be deposited in the Treasury in
accordance with section 286(u).".
(b) H-2B NONIMMIGRANT APPLICATION FEES.-- Section 214(c) of the Immigration
and Nati<;mality Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(c» is amended by adding at the end the following:
"(10)(A) Pursuant to the consultation process described in paragraph (1), the
Secretary of Labor shall impose a fee of $500 on employers that submit an application to
the Secretary of Labor for certification of a nonimmigrant temporary worker as described
In
section 101 (a)(15)(H)(ii)(b) on or after October 1,1999.
"(B)(i) The employer submitting the application under this subsection shall not
require or accept payment of the fee established under subparagraph (A), directly or indirectly, by
2
�Automated Records Management Systerp
Hex-Dump Conversion
the alien who is the beneficiary of the certification.
"(ii) If the Secretary of Labor detennines, after notice and opportunity for a
hearing, that a violation of clause (i) has occurred, the Secretary of Labor may impose a civil
penalty in an amount not to exceed $1,000 per violation and administrative order requiring the
return of any amounts received in violation of clause (i) to the alien, or if the alien cannot be
located, to the general fund ofthe Treasury.
"(C) Fees collected under this paragraph shall be deposited in the Treasury in
accordance with section 286(u).".
SEC.
. ESTABLISHMENT OF ACCOUNT AND USE OF FUNDS.
Section 286 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1356) is amended by
adding at the end the following:
"(u) ALIEN LABOR CERTIFICATION USER FEE ACCOUNT.
"(1) ESTABLISHMENT.-- There is established in the general fund of the
Treasury a separate account, which shall be known as the 'Alien Labor Certification User Fee
Account'. Notwithstanding any other section of this title, there shall be deposited as offsetting
receipts into the account all fees collected under sections 212(a)(5)(A) and 214(c)(1O).
"(2) USE OF FEES.-- The fees deposited into the Alien Labor
Certification User Fee Account shall be used by the Secretary of Labor for the costs of
administering alien labor certification activities, including the costs of enforcement, under
sections 212(a)(5)(A) and 214(c)(10). In addition, if, in any fiscal year, the Secretary of Labor
detennines that there are amounts in the account in excess of the amounts necessary to carry out
3
�Automated Records Management Systen"
Hex-Dump Conversion
the certification activities for such year, the Secretary of Labor may use the excess amounts to
carry out activities for dislocated workers in accordance section 171 (d) of the Workforce
Investment Act of 1998.
"(3) A VAILABILITY
O~
FUNDS.-- The fees deposited into the Alien
Labor Certification User Fee account under this subsection shall remain available until expended
for the activities described in paragraph (2).".
4
�Automated Records Management System
Hex-Dump Conversion
DRAFT 3/31/99
STATEMENT IN EXPLANATION OF SUBTITLE G
ALIEN LABOR CERTIFICATION USER FEES
This subtitle would require the Secretary of Labor to impose a fee of $500 on employers
submitting applications for certification of aliens for permanent employment or for H-2B
temporary visas (i.e. visas for temporary employment in occupations other than agriculture,
logging, or registered nursing). A similar $500 fee was established for employers submitting
petitions for H-1B temporary visas (i.e. visas for employment in "specialty" occupations) last
year under the American Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act.
For aliens to be eligible for permanent employment or H-2B temporary employment, the
Secretary must certify, pursuant to an application submitted by an employer, that there are not
sufficient workers available at the place the alien is to be employed and that the employment
would not adversely affect the wages or working conditions of similarly employed workers in the
u.S. Currently, the administrative costs of the Secretary of Labor in carrying out these labor
certification activities are funded from appropriations out of general revenues and employers are
not charged a fee for the processing of the application. However, since employers significantly
benefit from the admission of these workers, it is appropriate that they assist in paying for these
activities.
This subtitle would provide that the Secretary of Labor is to charge a fee of $500 for
applications for permanent immigrants submitted on or after October 1, 1999. In addition,
employers who have filed an application prior to that date would be able to receive a review of
that application under the same procedures used to review the applications submitted on or after
October 1 if they pay a $500 fee. The Department of Labor is currently developing and will be
implementing a new, streamlined adjudicative process for certification of applications for
permanent workers, and this provision would offer employers with pending applications the
option of using the streamlined process. The Secretary would also be required to charge a $500
fee for applications for H-2B temporary nonimmigrant labor certifications submitted on or after
October 1, 1999.
The fees collected under this authority would be deposited as offsetting receipts into a
special account in the U.S. Treasury. These funds would be available to the Secretary to, first,
pay the costs of administering the labor certification process, including enforcement activities.
Amounts in the account in excess of the amount needed in any fiscal year for administration
would be available to the Secretary to carry out projects to assist dislocated workers in
accordance with provisions of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (WIA). This additional use
offunds is appropriate as a means for providing American workers who have lost their jobs with
training and other assistance needed to obtain reemployment and for reducing the need for the
5
�Automated Records Management Systerr
Hex-Dump Conversion
admission of additional aliens to fill these jobs.
Specifically, this subtitle contains two sections. The first section provides for the
establishment of the fees.
Subsection (a) applies to fees relating to applications for labor certification of permanent
immigrants. Paragraph (1) amends section 212(a)(5)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act
(INA) to provide that submission of the application and payment of the fee is a condition for
receiving certification. Paragraph (2) further amends this section of the INA by adding a new
clause requiring the Secretary of Labor to impose a fee of$500 on employers submitting
applications for permanent immigrants on or after October 1, 1999, and on employers who
submitted such applications prior to that date who request a review by the Secretary of Labor
using the same review procedures applicable to the later applications. This clause also
prohibits an employer from requiring or accepting payment of the fee by the alien who is the
beneficiary of the certification. The Secretary is authorized to impose a civil penalty of up to
$1000 and order return of the payment to the alien if the Secretary determines that an employer
has violated this prohibition. In addition, this clause provides that the fees are to be deposited
into a special account in the U.S. Treasury.
Subsection (b) applies to H-2B nonimmigrant labor certification application fees. This
provision amends section 214(c) of the INA by adding a new paragraph. The paragraph provides
that the Secretary of Labor is to impose a fee of $500 on employers submitting an application for
certification ofH-2B nonimmigrant temporary employment on or after October 1, 1999. The
paragraph also contains the prohibition against employers requiring or accepting payment of the
fee from an alien who is a beneficiary of the certification and authorizes the Secretary to impose
a civil penalty of up to $1000 on an employer violating the prohibition. The paragraph further
provides that these fees are also to be deposited in the special account in the U.S. Treasury.
The second section of this subtitle relates to the establishment of the special account and
the use of account funds. This section amends section 286 of the INA to add a new subsection.
This new subsection establishes a special account in the general fund of the U.S. Treasury to be
known as the Alien Labor Certification User Fee Account. All fees collected for the labor
certification of permanent immigrant and H-2B temporary nonimmigrants are to be deposited as
offsetting receipts into the account. This subsection further provides that the funds in the account
are to be used by the Secretary of Labor for the costs of administering the labor certifications. In
addition, amounts that the Secretary of Labor determines are in excess of the amount needed for
administration may be used to carry out activities for dislocated workers in accordance with
section 171(d) of the WIA. Finally, this subsection provides that the fees in the account are to
remain available until expended for the authorized activities.
6
�•
Automated Records Management System
Hex-Dump Conversion
7
�ARMS Email System
RECORD TYPE: PRESIDENTIAL
Page 1 of 1
(NOTES MAIL)
CREATOR: Maureen T. Shea ( CN=Maureen T. Shea/OU=WHO/O=EOP [ WHO 1 )
CREATION DATE/TIME: 5-APR-1999 09:45:25.00
SUBJECT:
My mistake
TO: Rebecca M. Blank ( CN=Rebecca M. Blank/OU=CEA/O=EOP @ EOP [ CEA 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Elena Kagan ( CN=Elena Kagan/OU=OPD/O=EOP @ EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Joshua Gotbaum ( CN=Joshua Gotbaum/OU=OMB/O=EOP @ EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Maria Echaveste ( CN=Maria Echaveste/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
CC: Robin Leeds ( CN=Robin Leeds/OU=WHO/O=EOP @ EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TEXT:
I misunderstood the equal pay issue - there is no question about our not
supporting the Harkin bill - my apologies to all -
�ARMS Email System
RECORD TYPE: PRESIDENTIAL
Page 1 of 1
(NOTES MAIL)
CREATOR: Melissa N. Benton ( CN=Melissa N. Benton/OU=OMB/O=EOP [ OMB 1 )
CREATION DATE/TIME: 5-APR-1999 15:16:33.00
SUBJECT:
Reminder--comments on Revised Labor Draft bill on Alien Labor Certificatio
TO: llr@do.treas.gov ( llr@do.treas.gov @ inet
READ: UNKNOWN
[ UNKNOWN 1 )
TO: Peter Rundlet ( CN=Peter Rundlet/OU=WHO/O=EOP@EOP [ WHO 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Elena Kagan ( CN=Elena Kagan/OU=OPD/O=EOP@EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Robert F. Schoeni ( CN=Robert F. Schoeni/OU=CEA/O=EOP@EOP [ CEA 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: rademachpr@state.gov
READ: UNKNOWN
(rademachpr@state.gov
TO: justice.lrm ( justice.lrm @ usdoj.gov
READ: UNKNOWN
@ inet [ UNKNOWN 1 )
@ inet [ UNKNOWN 1 )
(OA)
TO: Robert F. Mahaffie ( CN=Robert F. Mahaffie/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Justine F. Rodriguez ( CN=Justine F. Rodriguez/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Cordelia W. Reimers ( CN=Cordelia W. Reimers/OU=CEA/O=EOP@EOP [ CEA 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TEXT:
This is a reminder that your comments on the subject draft bill are due.
please provide any comments no later than 10 a.m. Tuesday, April 6th, via
fax (395-6148), e-mail, or phone (395-7887).
If we do not hear from you,
we will assume you have no comments.
Please call if you have any questions.
Thanks!
�ARMS Email System
Page 1 of 12
RECORD TYPE: PRESIDENTIAL
(NOTES MAIL)
CREATOR: Melissa N. Benton ( CN=Melissa N. Benton/OU=OMB/O=EOP [ OMB 1 )
CREATION DATE/TIME: 6-APR-1999 16:50:15.00
SUBJECT:
LRM MNB39 - - REVISED LABOR Draft Bill on Employer Tax Credit User Fees
TO: Janet R. Forsgren
READ: UNKNOWN
CN=Janet R. Forsgren/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
TO: Justin D. Sullivan ( CN=Justin D. Sullivan/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Jack A. Smalligan ( CN=Jack A. Smalligan/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Robert G. Damus ( CN=Robert G. Damus/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Sarah Rosen ( CN=Sarah Rosen/OU=OPD/O=EOP@EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Robert F. Mahaffie ( CN=Robert F. Mahaffie/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Sarah S. Lee ( CN=Sarah S. Lee/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Cordelia W. Reimers ( CN=Cordelia W. Reimers/OU=CEA/O=EOP@EOP [ CEA 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: J. Eric Gould ( CN=J. Eric Gould/OU=OPD/O=EOP@EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Cynthia A. Rice ( CN=Cynthia A. Rice/OU=OPD/O=EOP@EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Larry R. Matlack ( CN=Larry R. Matlack/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Sandra Yamin ( CN=Sandra Yamin/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Jennifer E. Brown ( CN=Jennifer E. Brown/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Anil Kakani ( CN=Anil Kakani/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Peter Rundlet ( CN=Peter Rundlet/OU=WHO/O=EOP@EOP
READ: UNKNOWN
[ WHO 1 )
TO: Charles R. Marr ( CN=Charles R. Marr/OU=OPD/O=EOP@EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Joseph J. Minarik ( CN=Joseph J. Minarik/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Karen Tramontano ( CN=Karen Tramontano/OU=WHO/O=EOP@EOP [ WHO 1 )
�ARMS Email System
Page 2 of 12
"
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Harry E. Moran ( CN=Harry E. Moran/OU=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
CN=Elena Kagan/Ou=OPD/O=EOP@EOP [ OPD 1 )
TO: Elena Kagan
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Andrea Kane ( CN=Andrea Kane/OU=OPD/o=EOP@EOP [ OPD 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Carole Kitti ( CN=Carole Kitti/ou=OMB/o=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Barry White ( CN=Barry white/Ou=OMB/o=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TO: Barbara Chow
READ:UNKNOWN
CN=Barbara Chow/ou=OMB/O=EOP@EOP [ OMB 1 )
Karen DORSEY ( Karen DORSEY
READ: UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN 1 )
LRM TREASURY ( LRM TREASURY
READ: UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN 1 )
LRM JUSTICE ( LRM JUSTICE [ UNKNOWN 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
LRM HHS ( LRM HHS
READ: UNKNOWN
[ UNKNOWN 1 )
Sondra Wallace ( Sondra Wallace [ UNKNOWN 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
Kenneth CLARK ( Kenneth CLARK [ UNKNOWN 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
LRM COMMERCE
READ:UNKNOWN
LRM COMMERCE [ UNKNOWN 1 )
LRM Small Business Administration ( LRM Small Business Administration [ UNKNOWN 1 )
READ: UNKNOWN
TEXT:
This is a slightly revised version of the draft bill that was previously
circulated (LRM MNB24).
In addition to the revised bill, Labor has
provided answers to the questions that were included in OMB's passback.
Note to EOP staff: you will not receive a hard copy of this LRM.
The
attachments are approximately 5 pages total.
---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa N. Benton/OMB/EOP on 04/06199
04:44 PM --------------------------LRM ID: MNB39
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
Washington, D.C. 20503-0001
Tuesday, April 6, 1999
�ARMS Email System
Page 3 of 12
LEGISLATIVE REFERRAL MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
Reference
OMB CONTACT:
SUBJECT:
Legislative Liaison Officer - See Distribution below
Janet R. Forsgren (for) Assistant Director for Legislative
Melissa N. Benton
PHONE: (202)395-7887 FAX: (202)395-6148
REVISED LABOR Draft Bill on Employer Tax Credit User Fees
DEADLINE:
3 p.m. Wednesday, April 7, 1999
In accordance with OMB Circular A-19, OMB requests the views of your
agency on the above subject before advising on its relationship to the
program of the President.
Please advise us if this item will affect
direct spending or receipts for purposes of the "Pay-As-You-Go" provisions
of Title XIII of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990.
COMMENTS:
DISTRIBUTION LIST
AGENCIES:
118-TREASURY - Richard S. Carro - (202) 622-0650
25-COMMERCE - Michael A. Levitt - (202) 482-3151
52-HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - Sondra S. Wallace - (202) 690~7760
107-Small Business Administration - Mary Kristine Swedin - (202) 205-6700
61-JUSTICE - Dennis Burke - (202) 514-2141
EOP:
Barbara Chow
Sandra Yamin
Barry White
Larry R. Matlack
Carole Kitti
Cynthia A. Rice
Andrea Kane
J. Eric Gould
Elena Kagan
Cordelia W. Reimers
Harry E. Moran
Sarah S. Lee
Karen Tramontano
Robert F. Mahaffie
Joseph J. Minarik
Sarah Rosen
Charles R. Marr
Robert G. Damus
,Peter Rundlet
Jack A. Smalligan
Anil Kakani
Justin D. Sullivan
Jennifer E. Brown
Janet R. Forsgren
LRM ID: MNB39
SUBJECT:
User Fees
RESPONSE TO
LEGISLATIVE REFERRAL
MEMORANDUM
REVISED LABOR
Draft Bill on Employer Tax Credit
If your response to this request for views is short (e.g., concur/no
�ARMS Email System
Page 4 of12
comment), we prefer that you respond bye-mail or by faxing us this
response sheet.
If the response is short and you prefer to call, please
call the branch-wide line shown below (NOT the analyst's line) to leave a
message with a legislative assistant.
You may also respond by:
(1) calling the analyst/attorney's direct line (you will be
connected to voice mail if the analyst does not answer); or
(2) sending us a memo or letter
Please include the LRM number shown above, and the subject shown below.
TO:
Melissa N. Benton Phone:
395-7887
Fax:
395-6148
Office of Management and Budget
Branch-Wide Line (to reach legislative assistant): 395-7362
(Date)
FROM:
(Name)
(Agency)
(Telephone)
The following is the response of our agency to your request for views on
the above-captioned subject:
Concur
No Objection
No Comment
See proposed edits on pages
Other:
FAX RETURN of _____ pages, attached to this response sheet
- Wotcqna.wpd==================== ATTACHMENT
ATT CREATION TIME/DATE:
0 00:00:00.00
1 ====================
TEXT:
Unable to convert ARMS_EXT: [ATTACH.D40]MAIL42065190U.136 to ASCII,
The following is a HEX DUMP:
FF575043C9040000010A0201000000020500000004300000000200OOA0965B156378CA22D50594
ADC9CEF24180FOA2C5E34C28194B1721550A1A30E5D5C46BAEE042465269991E5DE208BA218693
47910FDDB61E21E6A474231FD5C2EED350F25E1FAOE14BAB3B3E52BF05DE4D96FA4462B04AAF5B
05615CF7E56A9CEAOABF8D45CAD1C9FDECEABOF2CC510FFAFOA5E7B265EBA171759937A59E157E
06997504F8E7D9D29FB16107A13F37E239CBAAABECC9BF75E2EFEEBD3E2FFFC879174F6710334D
C70EEB5269FA691155EEE2143DA49B1E53C63BED23575E401617E26738DE5F243D05C8B4BAFEAD
5BE8E4CC3B49442E733A63DABAA5B5D72BB0129987FEC6EBF0745580AF39CE4DD6016D9CCD3820
07F3F14205BB8EBBB47E1476841D9Dl1320351A98367254D177800DEA06AF7C641E047C74A6D36
5A02C6D7DC2E72AD2A773EC94F54B499A24815F334F15A6560200320359BE4C046E1EFEC221693
916706DF1AC9D054C6B4C4CBA748E5645C80E152E11A14DF1025FE7F5F28905CA25687C476763F
DA4906A1613072184B1C31BF922815FF053E6031F5D95B09925A5A2A3ECOE1F476CCBBF1E70FBE
D98D05FFA3EEED27BB6E086E6D2F8BA66FBEAB50EFDC9FC1A79B2E408D3D4723200501Al1249FA
�Automated Records Manage~ent Systen"
Hex-Dump Conversion
DRAFT 4/6/99
SUBTITLE H-EMPLOYER TAX CREDIT USER FEES
SEC. WORK OPPORTUNITY CREDIT AND WELFARE-TO-WORK CREDIT USER FEES.
(a) ESTABLISHMENT.- Subject to subsection (e), the Secretary of Labor is authorized
to impose a fee on employers submitting applications for certification of individuals as members
of target groups under sections 51(d)(12) or 51A(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26
U.S.C. 51(d)(12) and 51A(d)(1», relating to the Work Opportunity Credit and the
Welfare-to-Work Credit, respectively. The fees imposed under this section shall not be paid,
directly or indirectly, by the individual who is the subject of the certification.
(b) AMOUNT OF FEE.-The amount of the fee imposed under this section shall be
determined by the Secretary of Labor based on the Secretary's estimate of the amounts needed
to fully fund the costs of administering the requirements relating to the certification of target
group members under sections 51 and 51A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 51
and 51A). The Secretary of Labor is authorized to establish a fee for employers with fewer than
100 employees at an amount that is less than the fee established for employers with 100 or more
employees.
(c) COLLECTION AND DEPOSIT.-The fees imposed under this section shall be
collected by the Secretary of Labor through the designated local agency specified in section
51(d)(11) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 51 (d)(ll» and deposited as offsetting
receipts in the State Unemployment Insurance and Employment Service Operations account of
the Treasury of the United States.
�Automated Records Management Sysrer.
Hex-Dump Conversion
(d) USE OF FUNDS.-The funds deposited pursuant to subsection (c) shall be available to
the Secretary of Labor to pay the costs of administering the requirements relating to the
certification of individuals as target group members under sections 51 and 51A of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 51 and 51A). The Secretary of Labor shall allocate the funds
. among the States based on the relative workload of the States in processing the certifications.
(e) APPROPRIATIONS ACTION REQUIRED.- The fees authorized under this section
shall be collected and available for obligation only to the extent and in the amount provided in
advance in appropriations acts. The fees are authorized to be appropriated to remain available
until expended ..
�Automated Records Management System
Hex-Dump Conversion
DRAFT 4/6/99
STATEMENT IN EXPLANATION OF SUBTITLE H
EMPLOYER TAX CREDIT USER FEES
Subtitle H would authorize the Secretary of Labor, subjectto approval provided in
advance in appropriations acts, to impose a fee on employers submitting applications for
certification of individuals as target group members under the Work Opportunity Tax Credit
(WOTC) and the Welfare-to-Work Tax Credit (WtW) programs.
These two employer tax credits are administered by the Secretary of Labor and the
Secretary of the Treasury and allow employers to claim a credit for wages paid to individuals
hired by the employer who are certified as being members of one or more target groups specified
in the law. There are eight target groups specified under the WOTC (e.g., qualified welfare
recipients, qualified veterans) and the one target group oflong-term family assistance recipients
specified under the WtW credit. The Secretary of Labor is responsible for accepting and
processing applications submitted by employers to certify that an individual to be hired is a
member of a target group. Under current law, the Secretary carries out the certification
responsibilities through the State employment security agencies.
Currently, employers are not charged a fee for the processing of the application and the
administrative costs are funded from appropriations out of general revenues. However, since
employers are able to claim significant benefits under these programs, it is appropriate that they
assist in funding these administrative costs. Specifically, employers are able to claim a credit of
up to $2400 for the first $6000 in wages paid to a target group member under the WOTC, up to
$3500 for the first $10,000 in wages paid to a target group member under WtW in the first year
of employment, and up to $5,000 for the first $10,000 paid to the member under WtW in the
second year of employment.
The amount of the fee would be based on the Secretary of Labor's estimate of the amount
necessary to fully fund the administration of the certification process. For example, based on
current information relating to the number of certifications processed and related administrative
costs, the fee would likely be an average of $75 per application if the amount was presently
determined. When weighed against the amounts of the credits, it is unlikely that such a fee would
be a significant burden on employers or deter employer participation in the programs. However,
in order to minimize the burden on small employers, this section would authorize the Secretary to
establish a lower fee for employers with fewer than 100 employees.
The funds collected would be deposited as offsetting receipts in the State Unemployment
Insurance and Employment Service Operations account in the U.S.Treasury (the account that
contains the funds approriated to carry out the current certification activities and other UIIES
activities) and would be available to the Secretary of Labor for the administration of the WOTC
and WtW credit target group certification process. The Secretary of Labor would allocate the
funds among States based on the relative workload of each State. This approach would assist in
providing for a stable source of funding for these administrative activities and in ensuring that
�Automated Records Management SysterHex-Dump Conversion
funds are distributed based on the relative administrative burdens on the States.
This subtitle contains one section with five subsections. Subsection (a) authorizes the
Secretary of Labor to impose the fee on employers submitting the application for certifications
under the WOTC and WtW credit programs and provides that the fee is not to be paid, directly or
indirectly, by the individual who is the subject of the certification.
Subsection (b) provides that the amount of the fee is to be determined by the Secretary of
Labor based on the Secretary's estimate of the amounts necessary to fully fund the certification
. process. In addition, the Secretary is authorized to establish a fee for employers with fewer than
100 employees that is lower than the fee established for larger employers.
Subsection (c) provides that the fee is to be collected by the Secretary of Labor through
the designated local agency under the WOTC (i.e., the State employment security agencies) and
deposited as offsetting receipts in the State Unemployment Insurance and Employment Service
Operations account ofthe U.S. Treasury.
Subsection (d) provides that funds deposited in the account are available to the Secretary
of Labor to pay the costs of administering the certification processes under the WOTC and WtW
credit. The Secretary is to allocate the funds based on the relative workload of the States in
processing the certifications.
Finally, subsection (e) provides that the fees under this section may only be collected and
available for obligation to the extent and in the amounts provided for in advance by
appropriations acts. This subsection also provides that the fees are authorized to be appropriated
to remain available until expended.
�Automated Records Management Syslen
Hex-Dump Conversion
Questions/General Comments on the Legislation:
1.
The draft bill would allow the DOL to charge a lower fee for employers with less
than 50 employees. Why did the Department of Labor choose this cutoff level, as
opposed to a larger one (e.g. 500, as is generally used under other statutes)?
The Department settled upon the threshold of 50 workers since more than 85% of all
employers have a workforce of less than 50 employees. However, the Department is
willing to establish an employer threshold at 100 or fewer workers since employers are
aware that employees are generally covered by the Worker Adjustment and Retraining
Notification (WARN) Act if they have at least 100 employees.
2.
What is the rationale for allowing a smaller fee (as opposed to uniformly
establishing a smaller fee) for small employers? Why not establish a requirement
that the fee be waived or reduced by a certain percentage? A requirement would.
provide more certainty for small businesses.
The Department will establish uniform non-discretionary nationwide fees -- one for
large employers and a significantly reduced fee for small employers.
3
How would the size cutoff pertain to franchises (e.g. fast food restaurants)? Would
they qualify based on the size of the establishment or the size of the parent
company?
Both tax liability and number of employees will determine the applicable fee for a
particular franchisee. In addition, the Department will work with Internal Revenue
Service, to modify IRS Form 8850 to include firm size.
2.
The bill does not state whether the fee would be imposed in cases where an employer
submits an incomplete form.
The entire user fee will be assessed upon the employer request for the tax credit, despite
the submittal of incomplete forms. Since States incur an immediate administrative cost
upon initial receipt ofIRS Form 8850, fragmentary or subsequent payments will inflate
the administrative cost and will minimize the States capacity to efficiently and
effectively manage the tax credit program.
�
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Elena Kagan
Description
An account of the resource
<div>
<p>Elena Kagan worked as Associate White House Counsel from 1995-1996 and Deputy Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy and Deputy Director of the Domestic Policy Council (DPC) from 1997-1999.</p>
<p>During her work at the White House Justice Kagan worked on many topics including, but not limited to: AIDS, budget appropriations, campaign finance reform, education, health, labor, race, tobacco, Native Americans, and welfare.</p>
<p>In 1999 President Clinton nominated Kagan to the U.S. District Court of Appeals, no hearing was ever scheduled and she was thereby never confirmed.</p>
<p>Note: These records were made available in response to a <a href="http://clinton.presidentiallibraries.us/freedom-of-information-act-requests">Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)</a> request, FOIA 2009-1006-F. This collection contains both records created by Elena Kagan and records concerning Elena Kagan. </p>
<p><strong>Descriptions of the Sub Collections:</strong></p>
<ul><li><strong><a href="http://clinton.presidentiallibraries.us/items/browse?search=&advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=70&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=Elena+Kagan%27s+White+House+Counsel+Files&range=&collection=&type=&user=&tags=&public=&featured=&exhibit=&submit_search=Search+for+items">White House Counsel Files</a></strong><br /> These records consist of files created and received by Elena Kagan when she served as Associate Counsel to President Clinton from 1995 to 1996. The files include but are not limited to records concerning Amtrak, campaign finance reform, gaming/gambling (especially as it relates to Native Americans), timber, regulatory reform, and welfare. The records include memoranda, notes, correspondence, articles, reports, executive orders, bills, and directives.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://clinton.presidentiallibraries.us/items/browse?search=&advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=70&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=Elena+Kagan%27s+Domestic+Policy+Council+Files&range=&collection=&type=&user=&tags=&public=&featured=&exhibit=&submit_search=Search+for+items">Domestic Policy Council Files</a></strong><br />These records contain files created and received by Elena Kagan when she served as Deputy Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy and Deputy Director of the Domestic Policy Council (DPC) from 1997-1999. The files include records concerning domestic policy topics such as AIDS, budget appropriations, campaign finance reform, education, health, labor, race, tobacco, and welfare. The records include memoranda, correspondence, articles, and reports.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://clinton.presidentiallibraries.us/items/browse?search=&advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=70&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=White+House+Staff+%26+Office+Files+re+Elena+Kagan&range=&collection=&type=&user=&tags=&public=&featured=&exhibit=&submit_search=Search+for+items">White House Staff Files re Elena Kagan</a></strong><br />These records are compiled from a variety of staff office files including the Chief of Staff, Personnel, Office of First Lady, Counsel, and DPC and include correspondence, memorandum, forms, and reports all concerning or having to do with Elena Kagan.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://clinton.presidentiallibraries.us/items/browse?search=&advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=70&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=White+House+Office+of+Records+Management+Files+re+Elena+Kagan&range=&collection=&type=&user=&tags=&public=&featured=&exhibit=&submit_search=Search+for+items">White House Office of Records Management Files (WHORM)</a></strong><br />These records are from the White House Office of Records Management (WHORM) subject file series. The Clinton Presidential Library inherited a document-level index maintained by WHORM during the Clinton Administration which tracked some incoming correspondence and other documents as they were circulated throughout the White House and filed by WHORM. The records contain files created and received by Elena Kagan that were tracked by the WHORM Subject File index. The files include records related to a variety of topics such as memoranda, correspondence, and Domestic Policy Council weekly reports. The records are tracked by an alpha/numeric code, and are listed as such.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://clinton.presidentiallibraries.us/items/browse?search=&advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=70&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=Elena+Kagan%27s+1999+Nomination+to+U.S.+Court+of+Appeals&range=&collection=&type=&user=&tags=&public=&featured=&exhibit=&submit_search=Search+for+items">Elena Kagan's 1999 Nomination to U.S. Court of Appeals</a></strong><br />After serving as the Deputy Director of the Domestic Policy Council, Elena Kagan was nominated to serve on the U.S. Appeals Court for the District of Columbia (D.C. Circuit) in1999. Her nomination expired in 2000 without Senate action. The files in this opening contain records from the White House Staff and Office Files, Counsel’s Office and Presidential Personnel, concerning her nomination. The records consist of Senate Judiciary Committee questionnaires, correspondence, law review files, news articles, briefs, and press briefings.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://clinton.presidentiallibraries.us/items/browse?search=&advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=70&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=Email+Received+by+Elena+Kagan&range=&collection=&type=&user=&tags=&public=&featured=&exhibit=&submit_search=Search+for+items">Email Received by Elena Kagan</a></strong><br />These records consist of email received by Elena Kagan during her time as Associate White House Counsel from 1995-1996 and Deputy Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy and Deputy Director of the Domestic Policy Council (DPC) from 1997-1999. In addition to the email proper, these messages include forwards, reply chains, and attachments. The attached documents include notes, memorandum, articles, reports, executive orders, bills, and directives. These email concern a myriad of topics including but not limited to Amtrak, campaign finance reform, gaming/gambling (especially as it relates to Native Americans), timber, regulatory reform, welfare and domestic policy topics such as AIDS, budget appropriations, education, health, labor, race, and tobacco.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://clinton.presidentiallibraries.us/items/browse?search=&advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=70&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=Email+Sent+by+Elena+Kagan&range=&collection=&type=&user=&tags=&public=&featured=&exhibit=&submit_search=Search+for+items">Email Sent by Elena Kagan</a></strong><br />These records consist of email sent by Elena Kagan during her time as Associate White House Counsel from 1995-1996 and Deputy Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy and Deputy Director of the Domestic Policy Council (DPC) from 1997-1999. In addition to the email proper, these messages include forwards, reply chains, and attachments. The attached documents include notes, memorandum, articles, reports, executive orders, bills, and directives. These email concern a myriad of topics including but not limited to Amtrak, campaign finance reform, gaming/gambling (especially as it relates to Native Americans), timber, regulatory reform, welfare and domestic policy topics such as AIDS, budget appropriations, education, health, labor, race, and tobacco.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://clinton.presidentiallibraries.us/items/browse?search=&advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=70&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=Elena+Kagan%27s+Records+re+Native+Americans&range=&collection=&type=&user=&tags=&public=&featured=&exhibit=&submit_search=Search+for+items">Elena Kagan's Records re Native Americans</a></strong><br />These records were created or received by Elena Kagan during her service as Deputy Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy and Deputy Director of the Domestic Policy Council (1997-99). These ten folders were previously opened as part of a Freedom of Information Act request related to Native Americans (FOIA case <a href="http://www.clintonlibrary.gov/Documents/Finding-Aids/2006/2006-0197-F%28seg%203%29.pdf" target="_blank">2006-0197-F</a>).These records consist of memoranda, emails, reports, notes, and clippings.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://clinton.presidentiallibraries.us/items/browse?search=&advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=70&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=Additional+Materials+re+Elena+Kagan&range=&collection=&type=&user=&tags=&public=&featured=&exhibit=&submit_search=Search+for+items">Additional Materials re Elena Kagan</a></strong><br />These records were taken from the files of Elena Kagan. They include memos to, from, and relating to Elena Kagan’s work on Domestic Policy issues. The records include some memos from Elena Kagan to President Clinton.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://clinton.presidentiallibraries.us/items/browse?search=&advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=70&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=Federal+Email+re+Elena+Kagan&range=&collection=&type=&user=&tags=&public=&featured=&exhibit=&submit_search=Search+for+items">Federal Email re Elena Kagan</a></strong><br />The federal email re: Elena Kagan consists of 114 email messages that were part of the Federal side of the Clinton White House. The email generally consists of summaries of meetings or telephone conversations in which Elena Kagan was a participant.</li>
</ul></div>
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
2009-1006-F
Provenance
A statement of any changes in ownership and custody of the resource since its creation that are significant for its authenticity, integrity, and interpretation. The statement may include a description of any changes successive custodians made to the resource.
Clinton Presidential Records: White House Staff and Office Files
Clinton Presidential Records: Automated Records Management System
Clinton Presidential Records: White House Staff and Office Files
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
Clinton Presidential Library & Museum
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
Adobe Acrobat Document
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Office of the Counsel to the President
Domestic Policy Council
First Lady's Office
White House Office of Records Management
Chief of Staff
White House Office for Women's Initiative and Outreach
Automated Records Management System
Tape Restoration Project
Security Office
Presidential Personnel
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
1995-1999
Extent
The size or duration of the resource.
2945 folders
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
Original Format
The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data
Magnetic Disk: Hard Drive
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
[03/19/1999 – 04/06/1999]
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
CEA
Automated Records Management System
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
2009-1006-F
Is Part Of
A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included.
Email Received by Elena Kagan
<a href="http://catalog.archives.gov/id/574745" target="_blank">National Archives Catalog Description</a>
Provenance
A statement of any changes in ownership and custody of the resource since its creation that are significant for its authenticity, integrity, and interpretation. The statement may include a description of any changes successive custodians made to the resource.
Clinton Presidential Records: Automated Records Management System
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
Adobe Acrobat Document
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
Clinton Presidential Library & Museum
Medium
The material or physical carrier of the resource.
Reproduction-Reference
Date Created
Date of creation of the resource.
6/18/2010
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
ARMS - Box 100 - Folder 001
574745